Nuclear Physics(Semi Empirical Mass Formula)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Semi Empirical Mass Formula (SEMF) to estimate the energy released during the spontaneous fission of Uranium-235. The user calculates the mass difference (Δm) between the reactants and products, resulting in a mass defect of 2.19245 u, which translates to an energy release of 2043 MeV using E=mc^2. However, there is uncertainty about whether the SEMF should be applied in this calculation, as the user is unsure if they should estimate nucleon masses instead of using known values. The user expresses confusion regarding their mass difference calculation, indicating a potential error in their approach. Clarification on the proper application of the SEMF in this context is requested.
Catty
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. Question : Use the Semi Empirical Mass Formula to estimate the energy released in the spontaneous fission reaction;

235/92 Uranium -----> 87/35 Bromine + 145/57 Lanthanum + 3n

2. Equations used :

(i). Δm = m(reactants) - m(products)
(ii). E = mc^2
(iii). u = atomic mass unit
3. Attempt to solution:

atomic mass for 235/92 U = 235.043929 u
" " " 87/35 Br = 86.920711 u
" " " 145/57 La = 144.921765 u
" " " 1/0 n = 1.009 u

thus, Δm = m(reactants) - m(products)
= 235.043929 - (86.920711 + 144.921765 + (3*1.009))
= 2.19245u

apply E = mc^2 = 2.19245u * (931.5 Mev/c^2)/u = 2043MeV

4. Problem:

i'm not sure if I'm answering the question right since it says "use the SEMF" , but this is how i am calculating the energy so far. Is this how i use the SEMF to calculate the energy, if not, how should the SEMF appear in the calculations? please kindly help...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are supposed to estimate the nucleon masses with the SEMF instead of looking them up.

I get a different result for 235.043929 - (86.920711 + 144.921765 + (3*1.009)).
 
thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K