Nuclei Single-particles Harmonic Oscillator Potential

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between quantum numbers and energy levels in the context of the harmonic oscillator potential for nuclear single-particles. The confusion arises from the oscillation of the l quantum number as the principal quantum number n increases, specifically why certain l values are associated with specific energy levels. It is clarified that the energy levels are determined by the energy required to fill subshells, rather than directly correlating with principal quantum numbers. The conversation highlights that even levels contain even subshells while odd levels contain odd subshells, emphasizing the structured nature of these energy levels. The Nuclear Shell Model by Kris Heyde is recommended for further reading on the topic.
bluestar
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I am looking into the calculations of a harmonic oscillator potential for nuclei single-particles. The information I am looking at is at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_model the specific section “Deformed harmonic oscillator approximated model”

The specific question is, I don’t understand why the l quantum number oscillates from 0 to 1 as n increases. Then after the first 2 levels the next series of l quantum numbers oscillates from 2 to 3 as n increases. And then again after 2 more levels the next series of l quantum numbers oscillates from 4 to 5. And of course all states at a particular level are added together to reflect the cumulative state as shown in the table. Here is a copy of the table that I am confused about which occurs right after the first two equations in that section.
“In particular, the first six shells are:
•level 0: 2 states (l = 0) = 2.
•level 1: 6 states (l = 1) = 6.
•level 2: 2 states (l = 0) + 10 states (l = 2) = 12.
•level 3: 6 states (l = 1) + 14 states (l = 3) = 20.
•level 4: 2 states (l = 0) + 10 states (l = 2) + 18 states (l = 4) = 30.
•level 5: 6 states (l = 1) + 14 states (l = 3) + 22 states (l = 5) = 42. “

Why don’t the levels/states go like this?

•level 0: (l = 0) = 2 >> 2 states
•level 1: (l = 0) = 2 +(l = 1) = 6 >> 8 states
•level 2: (l = 0) = 2 +(l = 1) = 6+(l = 2) = 10 >> 18 states
•level 3: (l = 0) = 2 +(l = 1) = 6+(l = 2) = 10+(l = 3) = 14 >> 32 states
•level 4: (l = 0) = 2 +(l = 1) = 6+(l = 2) = 10+(l = 3) = 14+ (l = 4) = 18 >> 50 states
•level 5: (l = 0) = 2 +(l = 1) = 6+(l = 2) = 10+(l = 3) = 14+ (l = 4) = 18 + (l = 5) = 22. >> 72 states

I understand how the states are calculated because of the table presented at the very top of this section. I just don’t understand how they determine which l states goes with each level.

Your insight would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should not think "Level 0" means n=0 where n is the principal quantum number (same when you look at the wood-saxon + spin-orbit coupling).


level 0: 2 states (l = 0) = 2, means that this is the lowest lying energy level with L=0, i.e 1s, and it has 2states.

Then you next energy level will be:
level 1: 6 states (L = 1) = 6, i.e 1p

Now comes the fun part, solving this potential, you'll get that the 1d (the lowest lying L=2 states) and the SECOND lowest s (L=0) states have the same energy - i.e they are degenerate.

level 2: 2 states (l = 0) + 10 states (l = 2) = 12

And so on.

So how you should read that scheme is that the levels are ordered in energy, solve the S.Equation and look for yourself ;-)

I hope this helped a bit.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Shells.png

Shows levels ordered by energy if you don't feel like solving any equations.

As Glenn said, it's not based upon their principal quantum number, but rather the energy level is based on the energy required to fill the subshells (which may have different principal quantum numbers).

Interestingly, notice that even levels only include even numbered subshells and odd levels only include odd numbered subshells.
 
Wow! Thanks Guys,

That clears up a lot.

I greatly appreciate the help.
 
So prob, we are here for you.

The Nuclear Shell Model by Kris Heyde

is a quite good book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K