Number of electrons emitted photoelectrically

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsTest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the photoelectric effect, specifically the relationship between the number of photons incident on a surface and the number of electrons emitted as a result. Participants explore the implications of photon energy and spectral sensitivity in determining the number of emitted electrons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumption that each photon can emit one electron, questioning the validity of this assumption based on efficiency and energy considerations. They explore the relationship between photon energy, power, and the resulting current, as well as the importance of unit consistency in calculations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions regarding photon energy and electron emission. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the calculations, emphasizing the need for unit consistency and the correct application of formulas. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the efficiency of the photoelectric effect.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion between different processes related to photon interactions, such as electron-hole pair creation in semiconductors versus electron emission from conductors. There is also mention of specific values and units that need to be adhered to for accurate calculations.

PhysicsTest
Messages
260
Reaction score
27
Homework Statement
A certain photo surface has a spectral sensitivity of 6mA/W of incident radiation of wavelength 2,537 A. How many electrons will be emitted photoelectrically by a pulse of radiation consisting of 10,000 photons of this wavelength?
Relevant Equations
##\lambda=\frac{1.24} {E_G}##
Spectral response : ##\lambda=\frac{1.24} {E_G}## ->eq(1)
Given, ##\lambda = 2537 * 10^{-10} m = 0.2537\mu m ##
##E_G = \frac{1.24} {\lambda} = \frac{1.24} {0.2537} = 4.88 eV##
1610509399461.png

So, i can assume if 10,000 photons illuminate then 10000 electrons will be emitted. But i am mainly confused with the value of 6mA/W. I think need to convert it into eV to know the cutoff wavelength at which the electron can be excited?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
So, i can assume if 10,000 photons illuminate then 10000 electrons will be emitted.
Based on what, precisely ?
 
From the text it says if a photon of high energy illuminates then an electron-hole pair can be created. Based on that if the 10,000 photons have sufficient energy then 10,000 electrons can be generated, that is the idea. Am i correct?
 
PhysicsTest said:
From the text it says if a photon of high energy illuminates then an electron-hole pair can be created. Based on that if the 10,000 photons have sufficient energy then 10,000 electrons can be generated, that is the idea. Am i correct?
PhysicsTest said:
View attachment 276153
So, i can assume if 10,000 photons illuminate then 10000 electrons will be emitted.
[Minor edit.]

No, you can't assume this. If this were true, the answer to the original question would simply be 10,000!

Your attachment says ‘can be created’ and uses the word ‘may’, indicating the process is not 100% efficient. For 10,000 photons, *less than* 10,000 electrons will be released.

Note that the original question is basically about knocking out-electrons from the surface of a conductor. Your attachment seems to be about exciting electrons inside a semiconductor, creating electron-hole pairs. You are mixing up two different (though related) processes - which is a potential cause of confusion.

Here are 3 questions for you to consider:
1) What is the energy in the 10000 photons?
2) Suppose the pulse of radiation lasts t seconds, what power (in watts) is delivered by the pulse? (The answer will be an expression which includes ‘t’.)
3) Using the given sensitivity (6mA/W) what current is produced during the t seconds? (The answer will be an expression which includes ‘t’.)

If you can answer those, you are well on the way to completing the question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest
They give you the spectral sensitivity in amperes/watt, and that is the same as coulombs/joule. The two ways of stating the units are identical. (These same units are also useful in working with photodiodes).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest and Steve4Physics
Steve4Physics said:
Here are 3 questions for you to consider:
1) What is the energy in the 10000 photons?
If i use the eq(1) in post 1. Then the energy of let ##n## photons is ##E_G= \frac{1.24n} {\lambda} ## eV ->eq2
Steve4Physics said:
2) Suppose the pulse of radiation lasts t seconds, what power (in watts) is delivered by the pulse? (The answer will be an expression which includes ‘t’.)
##E=P*t = P=\frac{E} {t}## ->eq3.1
##P = \frac{1.24n} {\lambda t}## ->eq3.2
Steve4Physics said:
3) Using the given sensitivity (6mA/W) what current is produced during the t seconds? (The answer will be an expression which includes ‘t’.)
##I^2 R = \frac{1.24n} {\lambda t}## -> eq4.1
R is resistance
##I = \sqrt{(\frac{1.24n} {\lambda Rt})}## ->eq4.2
If ##s## is the sensitivity
##s = \frac{I} {P}## ->eq5.1
I am not sure if i am proceeding correctly?
 
3.2) I agree

4.1) you bring in ##R## which is not present in the problem. Instead you want to take the power in Watts from 3.2 and multiply with 6 mA/Watt
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest
Ok, the current is then if ##s## is the sensitivity
##I = P*s## using eq3.2
##I = \frac{1.24ns}{\lambda t} ## ->eq5.2
If i use the definition of current as ##I =\frac{Q} {t}##
##Q = \frac{1.24ns} {\lambda} ## ->eq5.3
The number of electrons is
##\frac{Q} {q} = \frac{1.24ns} {\lambda q}## ->eq5.4
 
##P## is not in Watts yet !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest and Steve4Physics
  • #10
PhysicsTest said:
Ok, the current is then if ##s## is the sensitivity
##I = P*s## using eq3.2
##I = \frac{1.24ns}{\lambda t} ## ->eq5.2
If i use the definition of current as ##I =\frac{Q} {t}##
##Q = \frac{1.24ns} {\lambda} ## ->eq5.3
The number of electrons is
##\frac{Q} {q} = \frac{1.24ns} {\lambda q}## ->eq5.4
Just to expand on what @BvU said (Post #9)...

Your overall logic is correct. But if you are going to put values into a formula, units must match

Sensitivity is given in SI units. In the SI system a watt means 1 joule/second. So you can't use the value of photon energy in unts of eV, it must be in joules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link and PhysicsTest
  • #11
Yes, I always get confused with the units, the equation 3.2 now modified into
##P = \frac{1.24nq} {\lambda t} ## Watts
The number of electrons is then
##\frac{1.24ns} {\lambda}##
 
  • #12
I wholeheartedly second @Steve4Physics :

You have a tendency to use expressions without paying attention to the units, thereby creating an abundance of error opportunities. Striking example is the single relevant equation in post #1: ##\lambda=\frac{1.24} {E_G}## where you not only have to remember the expression, but also that ##\lambda## has to be expressed in microns. This is all very well if you are a professional spectroscopist (although some do everything in cm-1), but not for a general physicist or student.

I urgently recommend you to use SI units unless explicitly mentioned otherwise, and to remember the basic expressions in the simplest possible form in SI units.

In particular, for this exercise:
$$\begin{align}E &= h\nu\\c &= \lambda \nu \end{align}$$
so that ##\ \ ##10 k photons is ##\ \ 10^4 \ \displaystyle {hc\over \lambda}\ ## J

Multiply with 6 mA/W = 6 mC/J and you have the number of Coulombs per 10k photons.

Divide by e and there's your answer. So simple !
PhysicsTest said:
Yes, I always get confused with the units, the equation 3.2 now modified into
##P = \frac{1.24nq} {\lambda t} ## Watts
The number of electrons is then
##\frac{1.24ns} {\lambda}##
And how do you check the dimensions in this answer ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K