Number Theory non zero natural numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving divisibility properties of products of consecutive natural numbers. Specifically, participants are examining whether 24 divides the product of five consecutive numbers and whether 120 divides the product of six consecutive numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the properties of divisibility, particularly focusing on the factors of 24 and 120. There is discussion about the divisibility of three consecutive numbers by 3 and how that relates to the larger problem. Some participants suggest breaking down the factors of 24 for clarity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various approaches being considered. Some participants have provided insights into the factorization of 24 and its implications for the problem. There is an exploration of whether individual factors need to divide the product, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of proving the statements for all non-zero natural numbers, and there is a focus on understanding the underlying principles rather than deriving a complete solution.

mtayab1994
Messages
584
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For all non zero natural numbers n prove that:

1- [tex]24\mid n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)[/tex]

and that :

2- [tex]120\mid n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)(n+5)[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



1- For n=1 we get that 24 divides 120 so we assume that 24 divides n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)

and we show that 24 divides (n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)(n+5). From the first step we have that

24 divides (n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4), I can't quite finish it off. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Induction is not needed.

Can you prove that 3 always divides 3 subsequent numbers??

Now we have to prove that 24 always divides 5 subsequent numbers. Think about the prime factorization of 24.
 
If 3 divides 3 subsequent numbers than 3 either divides n or n+1 or n+2
 
mtayab1994 said:
If 3 divides 3 subsequent numbers than 3 either divides n or n+1 or n+2

Yes, true. But it is clear why 3 always divides 3 subsequent numbers?
 
micromass said:
Yes, true. But it is clear why 3 always divides 3 subsequent numbers?

I'm not pretty sure but i believe it is that when 3 subsequent numbers are multiplied together they are always in the from 3k(3k+1)(3k+1) and making that 3k is always divisible by 3.
 
Good. Now perhaps simplify the question in your OP by splitting 24 up in factors.
 
Ok when splitting up 24 into factors i got that : [tex]24=2^{3}*3[/tex]

And 3 divides n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4) because 3 divides n(n+1)(n+2) and 2^3 divides (n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4) because 2^3 divides n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3) and 3 and 8 are prime to each other so 3*2^3 divides n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4) right?
 
Last edited:
Yes. Go on... Do the factors individually need to divide the number?
 
micromass said:
Yes. Go on... Do the factors individually need to divide the number?

Sorry i edited my previous post while you were replying.
 
  • #10
The problem appears to be on the unambitious side. Actually, for ##n \in \mathbb{N}_1##,

a) ## 24\text{ | } n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)##

and

b) ##120 \text{ | } n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)##

Think modularly...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K