Numerical analysis vs functional analysis vs statistics for engineerin

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of courses for an engineering student considering graduate school in nuclear engineering. The courses in question are Numerical Analysis, Functional Analysis, and a research project in Statistics, potentially focusing on Monte Carlo methods. The conversation explores the relevance and importance of these subjects in relation to the student's future academic and research interests.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the research project is the most valuable choice for gaining recommendations for graduate school, potentially outweighing the importance of elective courses.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the research project’s relevance to their ultimate interest in nuclear fusion.
  • There is a recommendation for engineering students to prioritize Numerical Analysis and programming skills in C++ and Fortran, especially for those interested in R&D and simulation.
  • Monte Carlo methods are highlighted as widely applicable, suggesting that the project could be beneficial.
  • Some participants propose deferring Functional Analysis rather than dismissing it entirely, indicating its relevance to theoretical physics or mathematics, while noting its potential utility in control theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the prioritization of the courses, with some advocating for the research project and Numerical Analysis, while others see value in Functional Analysis depending on future academic focus. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best course of action.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the importance of recommendations and practical skills in programming, but there is uncertainty about how each course aligns with specific research interests in nuclear engineering.

Who May Find This Useful

Students in engineering, particularly those interested in nuclear engineering, R&D, and simulation, may find this discussion relevant as they consider course selections and their implications for graduate studies.

Hercuflea
Messages
593
Reaction score
49
Hey all, back with another question.

I have the opportunity in the fall to choose 1 (maybe 2 if I'm lucky) of the following classes: Numerical analysis (undergrad numerical linear algebra, using matlab), Functional Analysis (as a directed study course with a prof), and the other is doing a research project in statistics. The stats prof hasn't decided on the project, but I may convince her to let me work on Monte Carlo methods. If I want to go to graduate school in nuclear engineering, what order of importance would you place these classes? (I am working on the engineering pre reqs on the side as well).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, the top choice hands down is the research project. In order to get into grad school you will need good recommendations - the most useful ones would be from people that you did a research project with! That is likely more important than what elective courses you took as an undergrad - you can make up coursework in grad school as needed. I am not a nuclear engineer so will refrain from any recommendations beyond this. I wish you the best.

jason
 
Jason,

Thanks for the response. It is something I am carefully considering. It is only tentative as of now, but it does seem like it could be a promising project. I am just unsure about it because it may or may not be related to my ultimate research interest in graduate school, nuclear fusion.
 
Hercuflea said:
Hey all, back with another question.

I have the opportunity in the fall to choose 1 (maybe 2 if I'm lucky) of the following classes: Numerical analysis (undergrad numerical linear algebra, using matlab), Functional Analysis (as a directed study course with a prof), and the other is doing a research project in statistics. The stats prof hasn't decided on the project, but I may convince her to let me work on Monte Carlo methods. If I want to go to graduate school in nuclear engineering, what order of importance would you place these classes? (I am working on the engineering pre reqs on the side as well).
If one is considering engineering, particularly nuclear engineering, and if one is interested in R&D/analysis/simulation, then go with numerical analysis and learn C++ and/or Fortran. I recommend engineering students get as much physics and mathematics as possible.
 
Monte Carlo methods are used all over the place. Sounds like a good project. Absolutely make sure you learn C++ and Fortran before you graduate. You'd be amazed how many Fortran codes are still running out there and you may be asked to maintain one.
 
Thanks astronuc and carlgrace for the input. So best case scenario, I do the project and numerical analysis, and dump functional analysis? Maybe later on I will take it.
 
Hercuflea said:
Thanks astronuc and carlgrace for the input. So best case scenario, I do the project and numerical analysis, and dump functional analysis? Maybe later on I will take it.
For engineering or applied physics, I'd recommend the project and numerical analysis (with learning to program C++ and Fortran).

Rather than dump functional analysis, defer it. Functional analysis seems more appropriate if one is doing theoretical physics or mathematics.

Meanwhile, see this text - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=665468 - and others in the mathematics textbook discussion forum.

In control theory, an aspect of engineering, functional analysis would be useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K