Numerical integration of Bethe formula in Excel: help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the numerical integration of the Bethe formula using Excel to estimate the range of alpha particles in quartz. The user, a PhD student, references Groom and Klein's work on particle passage through matter but omits the density effect correction. The primary issue identified is that the Bragg curve in the Excel spreadsheet continuously rises without descending, contrary to expected behavior. The user anticipates a stopping distance of approximately 0.04 cm, indicating some correct calculations, but the energy loss should be zero once the energy reaches zero, which is not reflected in the current output.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Bethe-Bloch formula for particle energy loss
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Excel for data plotting and analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of the Bragg peak in particle physics
  • Knowledge of the implications of energy loss in materials, specifically quartz
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Bethe-Bloch formula and its application in low-energy scenarios
  • Learn how to correctly implement energy loss calculations in Excel
  • Investigate the characteristics of the Bragg peak and its significance in particle physics
  • Explore advanced Excel techniques for handling numerical integration and plotting
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in particle physics, and anyone involved in numerical modeling of particle interactions in materials will benefit from this discussion.

Moho
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a PhD student in geology in need of help from a physicist! Can somebody spot the mistake in my spreadsheet?

I am using an Excel spreadsheet (attached .xls) to integrate the Bethe formula in order to estimate the range (in cm) of alpha particles in quartz. I am using the version of the formula given in Groom and Klein's "Passage of Particles through Matter": http://pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2009-rev-passage-particles-matter.pdf (but ignoring the density effect correction because I am not interested in high energies).

In Excel, I can plot the Bragg peak (dE/dX against x) or the energy of the alpha particle (E against x). Something is very wrong: the Bragg curve just goes up and up and never comes down again (don't be misled by Excel plotting #NUM! as 0). I would expect dE/dX to start out at something like 500 and then smoothly increase up to the peak (like the Bragg peaks in Google image search).

I must be doing something right, though, because it looks as if the stopping distance is going to be close to what I would expect (about 0.04 cm).

Can anybody find the problem in the attached spreadsheet? Reward: credit in my thesis acknowledgments!

Many thanks!

Moho
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
For low energy (βγ<0.03), the Bethe-Bloch formula gives wrong results, as shown in figure 27.1 in the pdf.
Apart from that: After the energy is 0, the energy loss should be 0 as well, giving a nice Bragg peak.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K