NVH Test for rubber mounts on firewall

  • Context: Automotive 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BMW_Crashtester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isolation Rubber Test
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) testing of rubber mounts used to attach a component to a firewall in a vehicle. Participants explore various methods for testing vibration isolation and measurement techniques, as well as equipment recommendations for conducting these tests.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the best approach to NVH testing, questioning whether to mount the entire assembly to a dummy firewall or to shake the component itself.
  • Another participant suggests using specific rubber bushings for mounting but notes that they are building their own bushings from scratch.
  • Questions arise regarding the type of vibrations generated by the component, including the frequency range and whether it induces rotational vibrations.
  • Several testing approaches are proposed, including using two accelerometers to measure vibration transmissibility and conducting modal testing with an impact hammer.
  • One participant mentions the need for specific equipment, including a shaker, impact hammer, and ICP 3-axis accelerometers, while also seeking recommendations for data acquisition software.
  • A participant discusses the importance of measuring the transfer function across the bolt and the impact of measurement location on data quality.
  • Another participant shares insights about a design used by Toyota for mounting an ABS actuator, suggesting a potential reference for the current project.
  • A redesigned test stand is proposed, with the firewall bolted down to the floor and the shaker held securely, aiming to measure vibrations in three directions.
  • Participants emphasize the importance of reducing unwanted movement in the setup and the potential for training with new equipment purchases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches and considerations for NVH testing, but no consensus is reached on a single method or setup. Multiple competing views on testing strategies and equipment remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainty about the specific vibration characteristics of the component, the appropriateness of different measurement setups, and the potential impact of measurement locations on data accuracy.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals involved in automotive engineering, particularly those focused on NVH testing, component design, and vibration analysis may find this discussion relevant.

BMW_Crashtester
Hello gang! I am dealing with a new issue at work and I though you might give me some much useful insight.

Im trying to fix a component to a plate and using 4 screws and rubber bushings to attach said plate to the firewall. The component is around 5-6 kgs and needs to held in place firmly but can't be attached in a rigid way because it generates vibrations in operation.

I need to run some NVH tests to see if the bushings do their thing. Problem is I don't know how to approach this:

-Do I mount the the whole thing to a dummy firewall in which I introduce vibrations with a shaker and attach accelerators to the bolts to see what gets inside the cabin? Or do I shake the component and see what vibration I transmit to the dummy firewall? What is the best approach to check how well the bushings isolate?

-How would a test bench look like? I know I need to do some tests with component freely moving (modal analysis) but how will I check for vibration filtering for example in the Z direction? If I attach the dummy firewall solidly to a test bench and shake the component won't that affect the results considering in real life the firewall moves too?

Im at a standstill here, NVH is new to me so all advice is welcomed!
 

Attachments

  • sketch.png
    sketch.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 600
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for the recommendation Mike, but we are building this from the ground up and will be making our own bushings. So I still have to test them :nb)

! Also in the previous test for transfer function it is reported they excited the component with the shaker being handheld... Is this normal?
 
What type of vibration does the component generate? ie. Does it rotate so will induce vibrations at a given frequency? What frequency range are we talking about?
What equipment do you have available to make and record measurements?

There are several approaches to test this.
Two accelerometers: one on the active side (ie the bolt head) and the other on the passive (ie after the mounting spring). You run the component as intended and plot the vibration transmissibility.
Modal testing in this case is probably best done with an impact hammer. Tap it in Z then measure the response. To isolate the vibration frequency needs to be 1.41x the natural frequency of the object on the mounts.
 
Thank you for the input Chris :wink:

The component has a spinning motor, gears, ball bearings and hydraulic valves... We haven't yet purchased the equipment as we outsourced our initial test.
I was thinking about getting a shaker, an impact hammer and some ICP 3 axis accelerators. We have a pretty large budget, so we will also get the necessary capturing and processing equipment/software for future tests, do you have any recommendations?I can't place the accelerometers on the same bolt like you described because of space constrains.
This sketch shows how the first test was run (blue=component, red=bushings, green=accelerometers).
They suspended the "firewall" using a frame on some rubber isolating feet. Should I keep testing like this?
 

Attachments

  • setup.png
    setup.png
    888 bytes · Views: 610
I've mainly used LMS TestLab in the past and a bit of HEAD ArtemiS for data acquisition and analysis. It's very, very difficult to advise on data acquisition without knowing the specifics of the problem as the devil is in the detail.

Effectively you want the transfer function across the bolt. Measuring further away will add noise factors (no pun intended) to this measurement.

So if you are only interested in lower frequency vibrations then you can assume that bit of the casing moves exactly in phase with the bolt (i.e. the casing can be considered rigid). If you are interested in higher frequency vibrations than that setup may not be suitable as the casing isn't stiff at those frequencies. If the direction of interest is horizontal (in that schematic) sticking the active side casing accelerometer on the side of the case may be better than sticking it on the top.
 
I know toyota mounts their "abs actuator" to the firewall on newer prius cars but have separated it into two parts.
 
I redesigned the test stand:
Now the firewall will be bolted down to the floor, it won't sit on cart with wheels and rubber dampers built in the frame.

The shaker will be held securely in a frame as well. I intend to make 3 measurements, one for x, one for y and for z.

Is this right Chris?
 

Attachments

  • new_setup.png
    new_setup.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 581
Setup looks reasonable to me. All you really need to do is make sure that you aim to reduce and unwanted movement (eg make that shaker mount super stiff and heavy).

To be honest if you are planning to buy a system to do this, there will be some level of training included in any package. It's probably worth using this as a real world worked example and asking advice for setup and acquisition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HowlerMonkey and BMW_Crashtester

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K