Object on a string with a string wrapping around

  • Thread starter Thread starter WraithM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a teacher demonstrating a chalk tied to a string, which wraps around his finger while swinging, raising questions about the physics involved. Participants note that classical mechanics students often incorrectly apply conservation of angular momentum to this scenario, while the conservation of energy is the correct principle. The phenomenon is identified as an involute of a circle, with emphasis on how gravitational deceleration affects the system's dynamics. The conversation highlights the need for continuous energy supply due to the decreasing radius and the relationship between velocity and radius. Overall, the discussion underscores the complexity of rotational motion and the importance of correctly applying physical laws in problem-solving.
WraithM
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I saw a teacher today with a piece of chalk tied to the end of a string (for drawing circles and such on a chalk board) swing the string around, and the string wrapped around his finger and the string became shorter until there was no more string left. His finger was pointed parallel to the floor so that the plane that the string spins in is perpendicular to the floor. Is there a name for this sort of thing? Is this used in physics problems or anything like that? I'm just interested in more information about this specific situation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classical mechanics students are sometimes asked questions about this on exams. The idea being that almost all students will use conservation of angular momentum to solve the problem, which is wrong.

So, this allows the Prof. to give the "very smart" students an edge over the students who merely are "ordinary smart".
 
Last edited:
Count Iblis said:
Classical mechanics students are sometimes asked questions about this on exams. The idea being that almost all students will use conservation of angular momentum to solve the problem, which is wrong.

So, this allows the Prof. to give the "very smart" students an edge over the students who merely are "ordinary smart".

The law of conservation of momentum doesn't work, it is a rotational phenomenon.
Due to gravitational deceleration, for a given radius, after some circulations becomes insufficient to complete the circle, but since the radius goes on decreasing, the reqirement of velocity to complete the circle goes on decreasing as sqrrt of it.
If the mass, velocity, radius initally at a point given the total energy can be calculated.
The total energy remains conserved.
 
vin300 said:
The law of conservation of momentum doesn't work, it is a rotational phenomenon.
Due to gravitational deceleration, for a given radius, after some circulations becomes insufficient to complete the circle, but since the radius goes on decreasing, the reqirement of velocity to complete the circle goes on decreasing as sqrrt of it.
If the mass, velocity, radius initally at a point given the total energy can be calculated.
The total energy remains conserved.

Could you show me what you mean? (with math. I know calc and a good deal of classical mechanics, so I'll understand.)
 
WraithM said:
Could you show me what you mean? (with math. I know calc and a good deal of classical mechanics, so I'll understand.)
Let me tell you something, I am sure about everything except the last line.
The object is rotating in a vertical plane.
The minimium velocity at the topmost point to complete the circle is v=sqrrt.(g*r).
Normally, the energy required is exhausted after a few rotations, so it has to be supplied energy continuously.
The radius decreases, the maximum velocity required decreases proportionallyas sqrrrt of redius.
The man does not need to continually supply energy.
The radius, velocity and mass given at a point, you can calculate the total energy as
E=K.E.+P.E.
=1/2 mv^2 +mgx
x is the vertical distance of the point from the bottom of circle drawn with radius at that point.
I think this energy must be conserved throughout the process.
 
Last edited:
The name of the path is involute of circle. Angular momentum of the system is conserved, but you need to include the angular momentum of whatever the post is attached to, because the string tension results in a torque on the post which transfers the torque to whatever it's attached to (usually the earth).

This was covered in a previous thread:

Comparason of a puck sliding on a frictionless surface attached to string wrapping around a post versus being pulled or released via a hole is covered in post #17:
thread_185178_post_17.htm

link to post with links to animated pictures:
thread_185178_post_21.htm

link to post with the math of involute of circle:
thread_185178_post_32.htm

For the string pulled through hole case, #34 covers this case. The tension versus path while being drawn inwards is slightly forwards and while being released outwards is slightly backwards, so the puck speeds up as it's pulled in and slows down as it's released. Since there's no torque applied to the (assumed frictionless) hole, all of the angular momentum is in the puck (ignoring the string).

The math in post #34 is correct, but the paragraph at the end of post #34 about the involute of circle case (post) is wrong. The tension from the post to the puck is perpendicular to the puck (explained in post #32), not "slightly backwards" as mentioned at the end of post #34. The speed of the puck with string wrapped around a post case remains constant while it's is spiraling inwards or outwards. The angular momentum issue is resolve if you include the angular momentum of whatever the post is attached to as part of the system.

thread_185178_post_34.htm
 
Last edited:
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
47K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K