Objective Certainty: How Can We Know?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pctopgs
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of objective certainty, particularly in the context of Bayesian analysis as referenced in the television show Numb3rs. Participants argue that the character's shifting certainty percentages (from 86% to 92%) lack a clear methodological basis, suggesting reliance on intuition rather than rigorous statistical analysis. The conversation highlights the philosophical implications of certainty, referencing Descartes and the subjective nature of confidence levels in data interpretation. Bayesian statistics is identified as a key tool for deriving such certainty from data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bayesian statistics
  • Familiarity with confidence levels in statistical analysis
  • Basic knowledge of philosophical concepts related to certainty
  • Ability to analyze data critically
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Bayesian analysis techniques and their applications
  • Explore the concept of confidence intervals in statistics
  • Investigate philosophical perspectives on certainty, particularly Cartesian doubt
  • Learn about the practical applications of statistical analysis in decision-making
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, statisticians, data analysts, and anyone interested in the intersection of data interpretation and certainty in decision-making processes.

pctopgs
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'll get straight to the point

Today I was watching a television show in which a character said "from he data I analyzed, I'm 86% sure that I'm right" but when new data was revealed to the character, he says "Now I'm 92% certain that I'm right". The character doesn't show how he arrived at these numbers, and that's why I'm here: Is it possible to be objectively certain about something? If so, how?

I'm anticipating the character was just going by intuition and just made up numbers, but I just think it's unlikely that's that case...the Show btw is Numb3rs.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it comes down to a matter of opinion and semantics; but it would be pretty hard to argue that there is an absolute, objective certainty about anything (certainly Descartes wouldn't think so).
The way one would come about numbers like that would be through a Bayesian analysis of the data and the theory he's comparing them to. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_statistics
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_level"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K