Observables in condensed matter (QFT)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of quantum field theory (QFT) in condensed matter physics, specifically focusing on how observables can be calculated from amplitudes derived from a Hamiltonian. Participants explore the differences and similarities between high energy physics and condensed matter physics in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that QFT is used to calculate observables such as cross sections and decay widths in high energy physics and questions how this translates to condensed matter physics.
  • Another participant suggests that the occupation-number formalism and second quantisation are key to understanding QFT in condensed matter, allowing for the representation of observables through creation and annihilation operators.
  • It is mentioned that common observables in field theoretical condensed matter physics include spectral functions, linear response, decay widths related to quasiparticles, and renormalization group equations.
  • Some participants argue about the suitability of recommended texts, with differing opinions on the value of Mattuck's book compared to other classic and modern texts in the field.
  • Several participants provide recommendations for modern textbooks, including works by Altland & Simons, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Piers Coleman, while also mentioning the potential quality of Shankar's recent textbook.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the recommended literature for studying QFT in condensed matter physics, with no consensus on the best resources. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective approach to calculating observables in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of observables and the varying interpretations of the role of different texts in understanding the subject matter. There is also an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in transitioning from high energy physics to condensed matter applications.

Mr rabbit
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Quantum field theory is a powerful tool to calculate observables given the amplitude of some process.
I only know the application to high energy physics: you have a Lagrangian with an interaction term between some fields, and you can calculate the amplitude of some process. Once you have this amplitude, you can usually calculate two observables: cross sections (scattering processes) and decay widths (decay processes).

How does this work in condensed matter physics? You have a Hamiltonian, you can calculate amplitudes using the perturbation theory ... and then? What kind of observables can you calculate and how do they relate to the amplitude?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whoa! That's a whole course that you're asking!

I suggest you pick up Mattuck's "A Guide To Feynman Diagrams in Many-Body Problems" (Dover). It shows you how the "propagator", i.e. the Green's function, is applied in many-body problem of electron-electron interactions in solids.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr rabbit and Entr0pic
Excellent recommendation by ZapperZ; Mattuck saved my life when I began studying a course on quantum condensed matter physics.

Adding some more detail, quantum field theory manifests in condensed matter physics via the occupation-number formalism (or second quantisation). Essentially, creation and annihilation operators are introduced to add and remove particles in a single particle state (which, in turn, is a component of a many particle wave-function). Second quantisation is a fundamental part of quantum many-body physics.

In this formalism, observables can be represented in terms of creation and annihilation operators. Of course, it'd be boring if we were limited to just electrons and what not, but no worries: creation and annihilation operators can also be used to represent quasiparticles. An excellent example of the use of quantum field theory techniques in condensed matter physics is the famous Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of superconductivity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr rabbit
A few common observables computed in field theoretical condensed matter physics: spectral functions (the imaginary part of the retarded Green's function corresponding to some operator), linear response (related to certain amplitudes via the Kubo formula), decay widths (for the same reason as in high energy, but you're generally working with quasiparticles), renormalization group equations, bound states and their energies (also possible in high energy physics).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr rabbit
Most one particle properties can be calculated from the one particle Greens function. Energy density from the vacuum propagator. I would not recommend Mattuck, especially since you already know relativistic QFT.
Classics are Fetter Walecka, and "AGD" (Abrikosov, Gorkov, ...). There are also many excellent modern books on the topic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr rabbit and fluidistic
DrDu said:
Most one particle properties can be calculated from the one particle Greens function. Energy density from the vacuum propagator. I would not recommend Mattuck, especially since you already know relativistic QFT.
Classics are Fetter Walecka, and "AGD" (Abrikosov, Gorkov, ...). There are also many excellent modern books on the topic.
Feel free to mention a few modern books.
 
I'm a different poster, but I'll say that some good modern books include: Altland & Simons, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Piers Coleman. Shankar also just wrote a textbook, but I haven't had the chance to check it out (but his other books are excellent so I'd be surprised if it wasn't good).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: protonsarecool, Mr rabbit and fluidistic
Thank you for your answers. I will take a look at Mattuck and Piers Coleman then!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K