I Observed Redshift from Moving Source: Deriving the Result

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of observed redshift from a receding galaxy, emphasizing the relationship between peculiar motion and cosmological redshift. It highlights the need to understand the four-velocities of both the galaxy and the observer on Earth, with the equation for observed frequency being contingent on these velocities. The conversation also touches on the conservation of energy along the photon's path and the implications of static versus FRW spacetime on redshift calculations. Participants explore the mathematical framework necessary to derive the redshift formula, referencing specific equations and constraints. Overall, the thread delves into the complexities of redshift in the context of general relativity and cosmology.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
If a galaxy is receding from us, then the 1+redshift observed on Earth is the product ##(1+z_{pec})(1+z_{cosm})## of the doppler redshift due to the peculiar motion of the galaxy and the cosmological redshift due to the FRW metric. It makes sense if we think about some intermediate observers (e.g. someone stationary w.r.t. hubble flow but at the same position instantaneously as the emitting galaxy, who measures the doppler part only). Could someone show me how to derive the result from the general definitions? i.e. the galaxy has some 4-velocity ##u_{gal} = (u_{gal}^t, u_{gal}^r, 0,0)##, and an observer attached to the galaxy measures\begin{align*}
\omega_{em} = u_{gal} \cdot p = u_{gal}^t p^t - \frac{a^2}{1-Kr^2} u_{gal}^r p^r
\end{align*}where ##p## is the photon 4-momn. And the earth observer measures ##\omega_{obs} = u_{earth}^t p^t##. The constraints are that both 4-velocities are normalised to ##u \cdot u = 1##, and ##p^t = E## is conserved along the photon's path. That isn't enough constraits to derive the result, I think?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All we can observe in GR is expressed by local invariant quantities. Indeed the observed frequency of an electromagnetic wave is ##\omega=u \cdot k##, where ##u## is the four-velocity of the observer and ##k## the wave-four-vector of the em. wave. For more about electrodynamics in GR, see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/gr-edyn.pdf
 
ergospherical said:
##p^t = E## is conserved along the photon's path.
Are you sure? Remember cosmological redshift.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and vanhees71
In a static spacetime, i.e., if there are coordinates, for which the ##g_{\mu \nu}## are independent of the time coordinate, then ##p_t## is conserved along the "photon's" path.

Take Schwarzschild spacetime,
$$L=\frac{1}{2} [(1-2m/r) \dot{t}^2 - (1-2m/r)^{-1} \dot{r}^2 - r^2 (\dot{\vartheta}^2+\sin^2 \vartheta \dot{\varphi}^2).$$
For an observer "at rest", observing light from a source "at rest", indeed all you need to know is that
$$p_t=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{t}}=(1-2m/r) \dot{t}.$$
From this you get
The four-velocity of the observer at rest is
$$u_{\text{obs}}^{\mu}=(1-2m/r_{\text{obs}})^{-1/2}(1,0,0,0).$$
Then
$$\omega_{\text{obs}}=p_t u_{\text{obs}}^t=p_t (1-2m/r_{\text{obs}})^{-1/2}.$$
For the frequency at the source you get
$$\omega_{\text{source}}=p_t u_{\text{source}}^t=(1-2m/r_{\text{source}})^{-1/2},$$
i.e.,
$$\omega_{\text{obs}}=\sqrt{\frac{1-2m/r_{\text{source}}}{1-2m/r_{\text{obs}}}} \omega_{\text{source}},$$
which describes (for ##r_{\text{source}}<r_{\text{obs}}##) the gravitational redshift.
 
vanhees71 said:
In a static spacetime
Which FRW spacetime is not.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...