MHB Odd Space Question: Defining a Function from Reals to Reals for Negative Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter poissonspot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on defining a function from reals to reals that captures the concept of "nth roots" for negative numbers when n is odd. The standard definition applies only to positive reals, leading to the proposal of a function f(x)=(-2)^x for specific rational inputs. However, it is noted that this function is not continuous for all real x due to sign inconsistencies at certain values, such as x=2/3. Restricting the domain to fractions with odd numerators and denominators allows for continuity, but this limitation results in a loss of algebraic structure, making the set neither a field nor a ring. The conversation highlights the complexities of extending real functions to negative numbers while maintaining continuity.
poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Someone I talked to this week wanted to define a function from reals to reals that captured the sense that each negative number has an "nth root" if n is odd. We talked about how the standard definition only applies to positive reals, but considered this case if we defined, for instance, f(x)=(-2)^x=-2^x when x is the sum of rationals with odd denominators. If we just deleted/ignored the remaining real x's, and considered the resulting space would f(x) be continuous?

Any feedback appreciated,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
conscipost said:
Someone I talked to this week wanted to define a function from reals to reals that captured the sense that each negative number has an "nth root" if n is odd. We talked about how the standard definition only applies to positive reals, but considered this case if we defined, for instance, f(x)=(-2)^x=-2^x when x is the sum of rationals with odd denominators. If we just deleted/ignored the remaining real x's, and considered the resulting space would f(x) be continuous?

Any feedback appreciated,

I'm afraid not, since $(-2)^x=-(2^x)$ does not hold for $x=2/3$.
That is because $(-2)^{2/3} = 2^{2/3} \ne -(2^{2/3})$.
In other words, the sign flips up and down discontinuously.

If you further restrict the domain to only fractions with an odd numerator and an odd denominator, the function becomes continuous, since it is effectively indeed $-(2^x)$.
In any interval there are still infinitely many elements, so the limit-definition of continuous is satisfied everywhere.
However, you're left with almost no algebraic structure.
This set is not a field anymore (which $\mathbb Q$ is), it's not a ring (which the set with odd denominators is), and it's not a group.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K