MHB Odd Space Question: Defining a Function from Reals to Reals for Negative Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter poissonspot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Someone I talked to this week wanted to define a function from reals to reals that captured the sense that each negative number has an "nth root" if n is odd. We talked about how the standard definition only applies to positive reals, but considered this case if we defined, for instance, f(x)=(-2)^x=-2^x when x is the sum of rationals with odd denominators. If we just deleted/ignored the remaining real x's, and considered the resulting space would f(x) be continuous?

Any feedback appreciated,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
conscipost said:
Someone I talked to this week wanted to define a function from reals to reals that captured the sense that each negative number has an "nth root" if n is odd. We talked about how the standard definition only applies to positive reals, but considered this case if we defined, for instance, f(x)=(-2)^x=-2^x when x is the sum of rationals with odd denominators. If we just deleted/ignored the remaining real x's, and considered the resulting space would f(x) be continuous?

Any feedback appreciated,

I'm afraid not, since $(-2)^x=-(2^x)$ does not hold for $x=2/3$.
That is because $(-2)^{2/3} = 2^{2/3} \ne -(2^{2/3})$.
In other words, the sign flips up and down discontinuously.

If you further restrict the domain to only fractions with an odd numerator and an odd denominator, the function becomes continuous, since it is effectively indeed $-(2^x)$.
In any interval there are still infinitely many elements, so the limit-definition of continuous is satisfied everywhere.
However, you're left with almost no algebraic structure.
This set is not a field anymore (which $\mathbb Q$ is), it's not a ring (which the set with odd denominators is), and it's not a group.
 
Back
Top