Off-Diagonal Hamiltonian elements

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cowrebellion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Hamiltonian
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 10K views
cowrebellion
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I just have a quick question about Quantum Mechanics. It's probably a bit basic but I'm trying to get my head around the off-diagonal Hamiltonian elements of a perturbation. We can assume the unperturbed Hamiltonian to be degenerate.

If I have a Hamiltonian
[tex]H=H_{0}+H'[/tex]
where the perturbation contains off-diagonal elements what physical meaning does that have?

edit: When i say the off-diagonal elements I mean the off-diagonal elements of:
<nr|H'|ns> where r,s represent the degeneracy. Sorry!


I know not having the off-diagonal matrix elements in the perturbation remove the degeneracy (at least to first order in perturbation theory).

If they remain what is the physical meaning? I think it has to do with the various states interating in some way but I'm not sure. Any help on this would be great!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I've just been thinking about it and I think it just has to do with interaction energies between states. Is this correct?
 
Yes.

You can think of it as the "mixing" between your pure energy eigenstates. If there's coupling between degenerate states, as you show in your Hamiltonian, this means that there will be a coupling between these degenerate states.

A good physical example is spin-orbit coupling where the degenerate spin levels are coupled via Rashba Hamiltonian for instance...

Other off-diagonal elements may correspond to scattering elements in the Hamiltonian, but of course the mixing need not be between different levels, it could be between degenerate levels (most commonly spin) also, just as in your example.
 
Thanks for the reply I think It's all slowly falling into place.

I've not heard of the Rashba Hamiltonian but I'll try find it in a textbook somewhere.

Thanks again for the help!