What does off-diagonal term mean?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physlad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of off-diagonal terms in the context of the Higgs mechanism applied to the Lagrangian of a complex scalar field. Specifically, the term A_μ ∂^μ ξ is identified as off-diagonal because it involves both the vector field A_μ and the scalar field ξ. This indicates that the Lagrangian does not accurately describe physical fields, necessitating a rewrite in terms of real fields. By employing a unitary transformation, the complex scalar field can be expressed as a combination of two real scalar fields, leading to the correct formulation that includes a massive vector and a massive scalar, namely the Higgs particle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Higgs mechanism in particle physics
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of scalar and vector fields
  • Experience with unitary transformations in field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Higgs mechanism in detail, focusing on its implications for particle mass generation
  • Learn about Lagrangian formulations and their physical interpretations
  • Explore the concept of unitary transformations in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the properties of scalar and vector fields in the context of gauge theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics and quantum field theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of the Higgs mechanism and field interactions.

physlad
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
when we apply Higgs mechanism to the lagrangian of a complex scalar field... we get terms for a Glodstone boson, a massive scalar and a massive vector field in the new lagrangian..

we also get other terms.. one of them takes following form

[tex]A_\mu \partial^\mu \xi[/tex]

this term is said to be off-diagonal in the fields... what does this mean? and what does it imply?

I mean how can we know just by looking at such a term that our lagrangian does not describe physical fields? and that we need to rewrite the lagranigan in terms of real fields... until we get the lagrangian which contains a massive vector and a massive scalar (Higgs particle)..

:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The term you mentioned is off-diagonal because it involves two distinct fields, the vector field A_μ and the scalar field ξ. This implies that the Lagrangian does not contain physical fields describing a massive vector and massive scalar (Higgs particle), and must be rewritten in terms of real fields. This is done by introducing a unitary transformation on the scalar fields, which allows us to write the original complex scalar field as a combination of two real scalar fields. The same transformation can then be applied to the vector field, resulting in a massive vector and a massive scalar (the Higgs particle).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K