- #1

- 105

- 4

Also, I’ve seen it explained that some conductors are non-ohmic because the temperature caused by the current changes the resistance in the circuit. If that’s the case, isn’t ohms law still being obeyed, just with a varying resistance.

- B
- Thread starter FS98
- Start date

- #1

- 105

- 4

Also, I’ve seen it explained that some conductors are non-ohmic because the temperature caused by the current changes the resistance in the circuit. If that’s the case, isn’t ohms law still being obeyed, just with a varying resistance.

- #2

- 16,662

- 7,245

Yes. Ohm's law is valid at each instant in such a situation....I’ve seen it explained that some conductors are non-ohmic because the temperature caused by the current changes the resistance in the circuit. If that’s the case, isn’t ohms law still being obeyed, just with a varying resistance.

- #3

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

2020 Award

- 25,386

- 4,956

There is a lot of confusion between R = V/I and the full statement of Ohm's Law which implies the V/I ratio is constant at constant temperature.

Also, I’ve seen it explained that some conductors are non-ohmic because the temperature caused by the current changes the resistance in the circuit. If that’s the case,isn’t ohms law still being obeyed, just with a varying resistance.

Take a Tungsten wire in the Lab and keep it in a water bath. It will follow Ohm's Law because it is a metal and the temperature is constant. Put a thin tungsten filament in a light bulb and its temperature will change as the current varies (of course). I would say that the Ohm's Law conditions are no longer there so the lamp doesn't have a constant resistance. This could be indistinguishable from a different (non-metallic) substance / component that happens to have the same V:I characteristic as the tungsten filament. Who could then say that "Ohm's Law" tells us the resistance is V/I"?

If we look at Boyle's Law, we are happy to say P/V for gas in a cylinder is constant

- #4

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Education Advisor

- 26,152

- 9,542

I'm not sure how far this abstraction takes you. Any circuit element at any instant has a voltage across it and a current through it, so one can calculate an instantaneous resistance. The fact that this is possible does not necessarily mean it is useful.Ohm's law is valid at each instant

I look at it differently. Ohm's Law is the definition of an ideal resistor. Whether this is or is not a useful model for a physical object depends on the situation. Just like with frictionless planes, stretchless ropes, etc.

- #5

- 16,662

- 7,245

No argument there. I really meant it (and should have said so) for resistors experiencing modest changes due to temperature.I'm not sure how far this abstraction takes you. Any circuit element at any instant has a voltage across it and a current through it, so one can calculate an instantaneous resistance. The fact that this is possible does not necessarily mean it is useful.

- #6

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

2020 Award

- 25,386

- 4,956

Ohn's Law doesn't even require the word "resistance" to be used at all. It just states that the ratio V/I is constant at constant temperature. Calling the V/I 'instantaneous Resistance" implies some time dependence. Perhaps "Effective Resistance" would do better and then you could do Kirchoff calculations to reveal things about a circuit with some non Ohmic components. (This is what we do, ain't it? And it is "useful".)I look at it differently. Ohm's Law is the definition of an ideal resistor

- #7

- 105

- 4

But aren’t there ways to find resistance without measuring it? So at any instant, the value of R would have to be a single value based on resistivity, length and area? The statement seems stronger than just saying that there exists some current and some voltage.I'm not sure how far this abstraction takes you. Any circuit element at any instant has a voltage across it and a current through it, so one can calculate an instantaneous resistance. The fact that this is possible does not necessarily mean it is useful.

I look at it differently. Ohm's Law is the definition of an ideal resistor. Whether this is or is not a useful model for a physical object depends on the situation. Just like with frictionless planes, stretchless ropes, etc.

- #8

- 16,662

- 7,245

I think that the problem is that when you apply this to non-ohmic elements you get a result that isn't really helpful. That's Vanadium's point in post #4But aren’t there ways to find resistance without measuring it? So at any instant, the value of R would have to be a single value based on resistivity, length and area? The statement seems stronger than just saying that there exists some current and some voltage.

- #9

- 35,847

- 4,670

The ONLY thing I can think of is that you have to go back and look at the microscopic details of charge transport in the material itself. This is NOT EASY, because you either have to go back to solving for the Boltzmann transport equation, or worse still, go back to the band structure and figure out the scattering rate of the charge carrier. Each one of these still requiresBut aren’t there ways to find resistance without measuring it? So at any instant, the value of R would have to be a single value based on resistivity, length and area? The statement seems stronger than just saying that there exists some current and some voltage.

I don't understand how this is now related to your original question in this thread. Has that question been answered and you're going off on a tangent from it?

Zz.

- #10

- 819

- 188

- #11

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,529

- 2,297

Define high voltage?Do ohmic conductors obey ohms law at high voltages?.

"Ideal" ohmic conductors would. "Real" ohmic conductors would require more information. All real world conductors have some limitations. For example too much power and copper wire melts. The resistance of molten copper is an order of magnitude higher than solid copper.

- #12

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,529

- 2,297

The definition of ohmic conductor as I understand it is that the relationship between voltage and current is linear.Also, I’ve seen it explained that some conductors are non-ohmic because the temperature caused by the current changes the resistance in the circuit. If that’s the case, isn’t ohms law still being obeyed, just with a varying resistance.

In...

V=I*R

R can't be a function of V or I and remain linear.

- #13

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,529

- 2,297

- #14

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

2020 Award

- 25,386

- 4,956

I don't think there really is one. It's a term that's used as shorthand and it never needs to be used in actual circuit analysis.The definition of ohmic conductor

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 6K

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 6K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 15K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 979

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 810

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 609