On covariance of the Lagrange equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion presents a detailed derivation of the Lagrange equations using covariance arguments, emphasizing the transition from traditional terminology to a more modern framework. It defines a system of ##\nu## particles with masses ##m_1,\ldots,m_\nu## and position vectors in ##\mathbb{R}^3##, leading to a characterization of the system's position as a vector in ##\mathbb{R}^m##. The Lagrange-D'Alembert principle is articulated through the equation $$\sum_i(m_i\boldsymbol{\ddot r_i}-\boldsymbol F_i,\delta \boldsymbol r_i)=0$$ and further transformed into a covariance form, demonstrating the general applicability of the derived equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the Lagrange-D'Alembert principle
  • Familiarity with smooth manifolds and generalized coordinates
  • Knowledge of vector calculus and differential equations
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation related to physics and mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of holonomic constraints in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Explore the concept of smooth embeddings in differential geometry
  • Learn about the pullback of forms in manifold theory
  • Investigate the applications of covariance in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and engineers specializing in classical mechanics, particularly those interested in advanced formulations of the Lagrange equations and their applications in theoretical physics.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,242
Reaction score
1,051
Here is a sketch of deduction of the Lagrange equations by means of the covariance argument. I believe that it is a suitable substitute for the archaic terminology that is employed in most textbooks.

Assume we have ##\nu## particles with masses ##m_1,\ldots,m_\nu## and with position vectors $$\boldsymbol r_i=(x^{3(i-1)+1},x^{3(i-1)+2},x^{3(i-1)+3})\in\mathbb{R}^3,\quad i=1,\ldots,\nu.$$
Thus the position of the system is characterized by a vector ##x=(x^1,\ldots,x^m)^T\in\mathbb{R}^m,\quad m=3\nu.##
Assume also that the system is restricted by ideal holonomic constraints so that ##x=x(t,y)## where ##y=(y^1,\ldots,y^r)## are the local coordinates (generalized coordinates) on a smooth ##r-##dimensional manifold ##Y## and ##y\mapsto x(t,y)## is a smooth embedding of ##Y## into ##\mathbb{R}^m## for each ##t##.
The Lagrange-D'Alembert principle is
$$\sum_i(m_i\boldsymbol{\ddot r_i}-\boldsymbol F_i,\delta \boldsymbol r_i)=0.\qquad (1)$$
Here ##\boldsymbol F_i## are the given forces.
Formula (1) can be rewritten as follows
$$([\mathscr T]_j-f_j)\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial y^s}=0,\qquad (2) $$
where ##f=(f_1,\ldots,f_m)=(\boldsymbol F_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol F_\nu),##
$$\mathscr T=\frac{1}{2}\dot x^TG\dot x,\quad G=\mathrm{diag}(m_1,m_1,m_1,\ldots,m_\nu,m_{\nu},m_{\nu});$$
and
$$[\mathscr T]_j=\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial \mathscr T}{\partial \dot x^j}-\frac{\partial \mathscr T}{\partial x^j}.$$
Now employ the covariance:
$$[\mathscr T]_j\Big|_{x=x(t,y)}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial y^s}=[T]_s,\qquad (3)$$
where ##T(t,y,\dot y)=\mathscr T\mid_{x=x(t,y)}.##

Formula (3) is very general it holds for any smooth ##\mathscr T=\mathscr T(t,x,\dot x).##
It is like to accomplish the pullback of an 1-form from the manifold ##\mathbb{R}^m## to the manifold ##Y##.

Thus (2) takes the form
$$[T]_s=Q_s,\quad Q_s=f_j\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial y^s}.$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
465
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K