On Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, specifically the relationship expressed as ##\sigma_{x}\sigma_{p} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}##. It is established that pure Gaussian states minimize this uncertainty, achieving equality. However, for Gaussian states composed of mixtures of wavefunctions, the uncertainty principle is not saturated. The conversation also touches on the implications of varying the parameter ##\lambda## in Gaussian states of the form ##\psi=Ce^{-\lambda x^2}##, confirming that the inequality holds for all positive values of ##\lambda##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operators, specifically position and momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its mathematical formulation.
  • Knowledge of Gaussian states and their properties in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of wavefunction mixtures and superpositions in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Gaussian wave packets in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of coherent and squeezed states in the context of the harmonic oscillator.
  • Investigate the implications of mixed states on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  • Study the statistical mechanics of correlated double-Gaussian wavefunctions and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the implications of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and Gaussian states.

Ssnow
Science Advisor
Messages
573
Reaction score
182
Hi everybody, my question is a curiosity on the (generalized) Heisenberg principle:

## \sigma_{x}\sigma_{p} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2},##

where ##x,p## are the usual quantum operators and ##\hbar## the Planck constant divided by ##2\pi##. If I understood correctly, Gaussian states that are solution of the quantum harmonic oscillator minimize the uncertainty principle with the equality. The question is what happen for the other Gaussian states? It is true for every Gaussian state? For example considering a Gaussian state of the form ## \psi=Ce^{-\lambda x^2}## (with ##C## constant and ##\lambda## a real parameter) it is the inequality true for every ##\lambda##?
Thank you in advance for all answer to by doubt.

Ssnow
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ssnow said:
Hi everybody, my question is a curiosity on the (generalized) Heisenberg principle:

## \sigma_{x}\sigma_{p} \geq \frac{\hbar}{2},##

where ##x,p## are the usual quantum operators and ##\hbar## the Planck constant divided by ##2\pi##. If I understood correctly, Gaussian states that are solution of the quantum harmonic oscillator minimize the uncertainty principle with the equality. The question is what happen for the other Gaussian states? It is true for every Gaussian state? For example considering a Gaussian state of the form ## \psi=Ce^{-\lambda x^2}## (with ##C## constant and ##\lambda## a real parameter) it is the inequality true for every ##\lambda##?
Thank you in advance for all answer to by doubt.

Ssnow

By varying the parameters of the oscillator you can get any positive value for ##\lambda##.

In any case, it's straightforward to show that a Gaussian wave packet also exhibits the minimum uncertainty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
You can use any Gaussian for any system which admits position and momentum observables fulfilling the Heisenberg algebra, ##[\hat{x},\hat{p}] =\mathrm{i} \hbar##.

For the harmonic oscillator they are special, because they are coherent (with ##\Delta x \Delta p =\hbar/2##) or more general squeezed states (with the uncertainty oscillating between finite values).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
Ssnow said:
If I understood correctly, Gaussian states that are solution of the quantum harmonic oscillator minimize the uncertainty principle with the equality. The question is what happen for the other Gaussian states? It is true for every Gaussian state?

For every pure Gaussian state it is true, but for Gaussian states made up of mixtures (not superpositions) of other wavefunctions, the uncertainty principle would not be saturated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow
jfizzix said:
Gaussian states made up of mixtures (not superpositions) of other wavefunctions

Can you give an example of such a Gaussian state? (I have no problem with states that are mixtures; I just don't see how the term "Gaussian" can be applied to them.)
 
PeterDonis said:
Can you give an example of such a Gaussian state? (I have no problem with states that are mixtures; I just don't see how the term "Gaussian" can be applied to them.)

For a pure gaussian wavepacket, the density operator looks like:
\rho (x,x') = \langle x|\psi\rangle\langle \psi|x'\rangle = \psi(x)\psi^{*}(x')
The example that comes to my head is the statistics of a correlated double-gaussian wavefunction in x and y, when you trace over y:
\rho (x,x') = \int dy\; \psi(x,y)\psi^{*}(x',y)
Since we contrive it to be correlated, the joint wavefunction doesn't factor, i.e., \psi(x,y)\neq\psi(x)\psi(y)
The marginal position and momentum statistics are gaussian, but do not saturate the Heisenberg limit.

Correlated double-gaussian wavefunctions are commonly used in describing the position-momentum statistics of pairs of entangled particles. See for example: (https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06996)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis
Hm, then you pose the interesting question, whether there are also non-pure states, i.e., proper mixed states with ##\Delta x \Delta p=\hbar/2## or whether there are only the pure states, which are described necessarily by Gaussian wave functions. I've to think about this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K