Chemistry On Molecular Geometry of Hydrazine and Electronegativity

AI Thread Summary
The molecular shape of hydrazine (N2H4) is discussed, with confusion surrounding its classification as trigonal pyramidal despite having five atoms around the nitrogen. The bond angle comparison between H2S and H2O highlights that H2O has a larger bond angle due to the higher electronegativity of oxygen. Participants debate whether electronegativity or steric effects are responsible for the bond angles observed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of lone pairs and hydrogen atoms in determining molecular geometry. Overall, the complexities of molecular shapes and bond angles in hydrazine and related compounds are explored.
Kyoma
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. What is the molecular shape of Hydrazine N2H4 w.r.t. N atom?

2. H2S and H2O, which one has a larger bond angle?

2. The attempt at a solution

1. Trigonal Pyramidal is the answer given. But Hydrazine has 5 atoms around its central atom and I'm unable to fathom why is it in trigonal pyramidal.

2. H2O is the answer as O is more electronegative. But why is this the case? I've checked the internet and nothing tells me why an electronegative central atom could cause a larger bond angle.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: hydrazine doesn't have a central atom.

Are you sure oxygen electronegativity plays a role here? Explanations I remember called mostly for steric effects.
 
Ah~ there are 3 H atoms and one pair of lone electrons around N.

Steric forces? The explanation given to me was electronegativity?
 
Kyoma said:
Ah~ there are 3 H atoms and one pair of lone electrons around N.

Sounds like ammonia, not hydrazine.

Steric forces? The explanation given to me was electronegativity?

Can't help it.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top