Again, my method of proof is far too messy. Let E be a open subset of R.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Any collection of disjoint segments in R must be at most countable - pick one rational in each segment and from there we see that the collection of sets can be mapped to a subset of a countable set. In other words any collection of disjoint segments in R cannot be uncountable.

Where it gets messy is when I go from the collection of neighborhoods that equals E being an uncountable and NOT-pairwise disjoint. My construction of a new collection goes by first taking all nhbds that intersect finitely many other nhbds - and then each finite union of nhbds of this sort are also segments. Add these segments to our new collection. The nhbds that don't intersect anything but themselves should also be added. The nhbds that intersect infinitely many other nhbds will have a union that is either bounded or unbounded. If it's bounded then their union is a segment and these such unions should be added to our new collection of sets. The class of unions of nhbds that are unbounded - well I'm not even sure what to do with them.

There are tons of problems with this construction. There has to be an easier way to show that every open set in R can be written as a union of disjoint segments (the fact that this collection must not be uncountable is simple).

HELP PLEASE!!! I hate it when things get messy like this.

FYI :segment is of the form (a,b), a and b real.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# On open set on the line can be written as countable union of disjoint segments

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**