On pointwise convergence of Fourier series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the pointwise convergence of Fourier series for piecewise continuous functions with one-sided derivatives at discontinuities. The coefficients calculated using WolframAlpha are confirmed as \(c_0 = \frac{\pi}{4}\), \(c_{2n} = \frac{i}{4n}\) for \(n \neq 0\), and \(c_{2n+1} = \frac{i}{2(2n+1)} + \frac{1}{\pi(2n+1)^2}\). The series converges pointwise to the function \(f\) across all \(t\), with the evaluation at \(t=0\) yielding \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(2n-1)^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{8}\). The discussion also addresses the conditions under which the series can be rearranged, emphasizing the necessity of absolute convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and their convergence properties
  • Familiarity with piecewise continuous functions and one-sided derivatives
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly regarding series and limits
  • Experience with mathematical software tools like WolframAlpha for coefficient calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of piecewise continuous functions in relation to Fourier series convergence
  • Explore the concept of absolute convergence in series and its implications for rearrangement
  • Learn about the Dirichlet conditions for Fourier series convergence
  • Investigate the use of mathematical software for verifying series coefficients and convergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone studying Fourier series and their convergence properties, particularly in the context of piecewise continuous functions.

psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
Compute the Fourier series of $$f(t)=\begin{cases} t+\pi &-\pi <t<0\\ 0&0\le t\le \pi. \end{cases}$$ and find the sum of ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{(2n-1)^2}##.
Relevant Equations
There is the following theorem in this section of the book; suppose that ##f## has period ##2\pi##, and suppose that ##t_0## is a point where ##f## has one-sided limiting values and (generalized) one-sided derivatives. Then the Fourier series of ##f## converges for ##t=t_0## to the mean value ##\frac12(f(t_0+)+f(t_0-))##. In particular, if ##f## is continuous at ##t_0##, the sum of the series equals ##f(t_0)##.
So, the function is piecewise continuous (and differentiable), with (generalized) one-sided derivatives existing at the points of discontinuity. Hence I conclude from the theorem that the series converges pointwise for all ##t## to the function ##f##.

I've double checked with WolframAlpha that the coefficients are \begin{align} c_0&=\frac{\pi}{4} \nonumber \\ c_{2n}&=\frac{i}{4n}, \ n\neq0 \nonumber \\ c_{2n+1}&=\frac{i}{2(2n+1)}+\frac{1}{\pi(2n+1)^2}. \nonumber \end{align} Now, we have ##\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z} c_ne^{int}##, and I proceed with the following computation \begin{align} \sum_{n\in\mathbb Z} c_ne^{int}&=c_0+\sum_{\substack{n\in\mathbb Z \\ n\neq0}} c_{2n}e^{i2nt}+\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z}c_{2n+1}e^{i(2n+1)t} \tag1 \\ &=\frac{\pi}{4}+\sum_{\substack{n\in\mathbb Z \\ n\neq0}} \frac{i}{4n}e^{i2nt}+\sum_{n\in\mathbb Z } \left(\frac{i}{2(2n+1)}+\frac{1}{\pi(2n+1)^2}\right)e^{i(2n+1)t} \nonumber \\ &=\frac{\pi}{4}-\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\sin(2n)t}{2n}-\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\sin(2n+1)t}{2n+1}+\frac{2}{\pi}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{\cos(2n+1)t}{(2n+1)^2}\nonumber \\ &= \frac{\pi}{4}-\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\sin nt}{n}+\frac{2}{\pi}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\cos(2n-1)t}{(2n-1)^2}\nonumber. \end{align} To evaluate the sum in the problem, I set ##t=0## and keep in mind that this is a discontinuous point. I get $$\frac12(f(0+)-f(0-))=\frac{\pi}{2}=\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{2}{\pi}\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac1{(2n-1)^2},$$ i.e. ##\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac1{(2n-1)^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{8}##.

I'm doubting my own computation though. The equality in ##(1)##, when we split the sum into even and odd indexed sums, doesn't this require absolute convergence of the series?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What does you text tell you about how to take the double limit \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} c_ne^{inx} = <br /> \lim_{M \to \infty}\lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=-M}^{N} c_{n}e^{inx}? If you are to assume M = N then this procedure is justified: all the necessary terms appear in the partial sum.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: psie
pasmith said:
What does you text tell you about how to take the double limit \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} c_ne^{inx} =<br /> \lim_{M \to \infty}\lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=-M}^{N} c_{n}e^{inx}? If you are to assume M = N then this procedure is justified: all the necessary terms appear in the partial sum.
Yes, ##M=N## is the definition in my book. Are you saying that if the right-hand side converges (at least pointwise) in $$\sum_{n=-N}^{N}c_ne^{inx}=c_0+\sum_{\substack{n=-N \\ n \text{ even}}}^N c_{n}e^{inx}+\sum_{\substack{n=-N \\ n \text{ odd}}}^N c_{n}e^{inx},$$ then we can split the sum (technically rearrange it) into sums of even and odd indexed terms? I know it holds for positive series indexed by ##\mathbb N##, but I'm not sure if it holds for alternating, possibly complex, series indexed by ##\mathbb Z##.

If the answer is yes, I assume this follow from the limit law, where ##s_n=a_n+b_n## and ##\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n, \ \lim_{n\to\infty} b_n## both exist, then $$\lim_{n\to\infty} s_n=\lim_{n\to\infty} (a_n+b_n)=\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n+\lim_{n\to\infty} b_n.$$
 
psie said:
Yes, ##M=N## is the definition in my book. Are you saying that if the right-hand side converges (at least pointwise) in $$\sum_{n=-N}^{N}c_ne^{inx}=c_0+\sum_{\substack{n=-N \\ n \text{ even}}}^N c_{n}e^{inx}+\sum_{\substack{n=-N \\ n \text{ odd}}}^N c_{n}e^{inx},$$ then we can split the sum (technically rearrange it) into sums of even and odd indexed terms? I know it holds for positive series indexed by ##\mathbb N##, but I'm not sure if it holds for alternating, possibly complex, series indexed by ##\mathbb Z##.

You can't do <br /> \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=-N}^N a_n = \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{\substack{n=-N \\ n \text{ odd}}}^N a_n + \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{\substack{n=-N \\ n \text{ even}}}^N a_n because it involves taking all even terms before (or after) all odd terms, and that is only justified if the series is absolutely convergent. You can, of course, omit from the sum any term which is zero.

(Take care when indexing odd and even terms separately. You need the index to be symmetric about zero, so taking the even term as n = 2k is fine since -2k = 2(-k), but taking the odd term as n = 2k+1 is not since -(2k+1) \neq 2(-k) + 1. The index n = (-1)^k(2|k| - 1) for |k| \geq 1 does have this property.)

If the answer is yes, I assume this follow from the limit law, where ##s_n=a_n+b_n## and ##\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n, \ \lim_{n\to\infty} b_n## both exist, then $$\lim_{n\to\infty} s_n=\lim_{n\to\infty} (a_n+b_n)=\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n+\lim_{n\to\infty} b_n.$$
This theorem only applies if \lim a_n and \lim b_n exist separately; here they do not.

What you can do is <br /> \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=-N}^N c_ne^{int} = c_0 + \lim_{N \to \infty}\sum_{n=1}^N ((c_n + c_{-n})\cos nt + i(c_n - c_{-n})\sin nt). Now if f is real then c_n and c_{-n} are complex conjugates, so this reduces to <br /> c_0 + \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n=1}^N (2\Re(c_n) \cos nt - 2\Im(c_n)\sin nt). Setting t = 0 makes the sine terms vanish, and \Re(c_n) vanishes for even n so we are justified in writing this as <br /> \tfrac12 (f(0^{+}) + f(0^{-})) = c_0 + \lim_{K \to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^K 2\Re(c_{2k - 1}).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: psie

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K