On projected Density of States

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Projected Density of States (PDOS) and its relationship to Partial Density of States (DOS). Participants clarify that PDOS represents the contribution of individual atoms to the total DOS, which is essential for understanding electronic structures in molecular systems. The origin of PDOS is linked to Mulliken population analysis, which divides electronic density between overlapping atomic orbitals. The conversation also highlights the distinction between PDOS and Partial DOS, emphasizing their interchangeable use in certain contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Partial Density of States (PDOS) and Density of States (DOS)
  • Familiarity with Mulliken population analysis
  • Knowledge of plane-wave pseudopotential ab initio methods
  • Basic concepts of molecular orbital theory and the Extended Huckel model
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Mulliken's original paper on population analysis for foundational insights
  • Research the differences between Projected DOS and Partial DOS in electronic structure calculations
  • Explore the application of the Extended Huckel model in calculating DOS for crystals
  • Investigate the use of Overlap Population DOS in molecular orbital theory
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in computational chemistry, particularly those working with electronic structure calculations and interested in the interpretation of density of states in molecular and crystalline systems.

leoant
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Dear all:
I am frustrated in the concept of the PDOS, may someone be kind to refer me to the origin of this concept? Thanks.

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leoant said:
Dear all:
I am frustrated in the concept of the PDOS, may someone be kind to refer me to the origin of this concept? Thanks.

Regards

Don't you mean partial density of states ? When plotted out, they express the relative contribution to the total DOS (of a molecule built out of two atoms for example) wrt each other. I mean, the DOS of each atom is plotted in one graph. When you also add the total DOS you can clearly see which atom delivers the biggest contribution to the DOS of the molecule. These data are always plotted with respect to the energy (the horizontal axis if you will). They are the direct analogon of COOP's (crystal orbital overlap population) in chemistry. The origin is just the idea of COOP and more specifically, the Mulliken population analysis...Do you know this ? When two electronic levels overlap, you say that there is an electronic density between two atoms : a chemist calls this the bond, right ? Now, what if you persist in wanting to divide up the electronic density between the two atoms that are involved ? I mean, how to assign the overlap density to the two centers ? Well, Mulliken suggested that you should just deivide this overlap density by a actor two and then assign it to each atom...


marlon
 
Thank you for your reply, marlon. Yeah I am reading the paper by R. S. Mulliken, however, what I really do is calculation with plane-wave pseudopotential ab initio method and I want to interpret my results. Thus I wonder how can one derive the same meaning for plane waves as AOs in Mulliken's realm? And further more, as to crystals, which are different from moleculars, how can one use, say, the Mulliken Population Analysis correctly and make sense? And I still want to know if there is any difference between "Projected DOS" and "Partial DOS", or there's no "Projected DOS" and only "Partial DOS"?
 
I think the terminology is almost interchangeable, but not quite. Partial DOS refers to both Gross Population DOS as well as Projected DOS.

I do not know enough about this but I too would have recommended Mulliken's paper on population analysis.

Also, you could look for calculations for crystals in the framework of the Extended Huckel model (a modified form of molecular orbital theory) using Overlap Population DOS.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K