One-dimensional Uniform plane wave

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter avinamaurya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Uniform Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the one-dimensional uniform plane wave equation, specifically the form E = F1(z-ct) + F2(z+ct) as a general solution to the second-order differential equation. It introduces the wave equation in one spatial dimension, expressed as ∂1² f(x1,x2) - ∂2² f(x1,x2) = 0, and demonstrates a method using light-cone coordinates (ξ = x1 + x2, η = x1 - x2) to simplify the integration process. The final solution is presented as f(x1,x2) = f1(x1-x2) + f2(x1+x2), where f1 and f2 are arbitrary functions determined by initial and boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with differential equations, particularly second-order equations
  • Knowledge of light-cone coordinates and their application in physics
  • Basic integration techniques in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the method of characteristics for solving partial differential equations
  • Study the application of Laplace transforms in solving wave equations
  • Investigate boundary value problems in the context of wave equations
  • Learn about Fourier transforms and their role in wave analysis
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and engineering students focusing on wave mechanics, as well as anyone interested in advanced methods for solving differential equations.

avinamaurya
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
to solve one dimensional uniform plane wave, why assumed E = F1(z-ct) + F2(z+ct) as a general solution of second order differential equation and in trigonometric form particular function assumed to be Ey =Sin B(z+mt).. Is there any other method like Laplace solution or something where i don't have to assume this... ..
upload_2014-10-1_11-16-56.png

Is there solution exist without assuming anything for this function.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Let's write the equation as
[tex]\partial_1^2 f(x_1,x_2)-\partial_2^2 f(x_1,x_2)=0.[/tex]
You can always set [itex]x_1=c t[/itex] to get it in physical units of time.

This is the wave equation in 1 spatial dimension. Now the trick is to rewrite this in terms of "light-cone coordinates",
[tex]\xi=x_1+x_2, \quad \eta=x_1-x_2.[/tex]
Now you have, according to the chain rule,
[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial x_1} f=\frac{\partial \xi}{\partial x_1} \frac{\partial f}{\partial \xi} +\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial x_1} \frac{\partial f}{\partial \eta}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial \xi} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial \eta}.[/tex]
In the same way you derive step by step the second derivatives [itex]\partial_1^2[/itex] and [itex]\partial_2^2[/itex] in terms of the derivatives with respect to the light-cone variables [itex]\xi[/itex] and [itex]\eta[/itex].

At the end the wave equation reads
[tex]\partial_{\xi} \partial_{\eta} f=0.[/tex]
This is now very easy to integrate. The vanishing of the partial derivative with respect to [itex]\xi[/itex] means that the function is only dependent on [itex]\eta[/itex]. Thus you have
[tex]\partial_{\eta} f=g(\eta).[/tex]
But this implies that
[tex]f(\xi,\eta)=f_1(\eta)+f_2(\xi), \quad f(\eta)=\int \mathrm{d} \eta g(\eta).[/tex]
There's an additional function [itex]f_2(\xi)[/itex], because the partial derivative of a function wrt. to [itex]\eta[/itex] determines this function only up to a function, indepenent of [itex]\eta[/itex], i.e., it can only depend on [itex]\xi[/itex].

Now you can rewrite this equation in terms of the old coordinates, i.e.,
[tex]f(x_1,x_2)=f_1(x_1-x_2) + f_2(x_1+x_2).[/tex]
Here [itex]f_1[/itex] and [itex]f_2[/itex] are indeed arbitrary functions that are determined by appropriate initial and boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
500
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K