One to one function is monotone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HaLAA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The statement "A one to one function f: ℝ→ℝ is monotone" is false. A counterexample is provided with the function f(x) defined as f(x) = x for rational x and f(x) = -x for irrational x, demonstrating that the function is injective but not monotone due to its discontinuous nature. Additionally, the discussion highlights that while a function can be monotone on dense subsets, it may not be overall continuous or monotone across its entire domain of ℝ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of one-to-one functions (injective functions)
  • Knowledge of monotonicity in functions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic comprehension of continuity and discontinuity in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of injective functions in real analysis
  • Study monotonic functions and their definitions in detail
  • Explore examples of discontinuous functions and their implications
  • Learn about dense subsets in real numbers and their significance in function analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying real analysis or exploring the properties of functions, particularly in the context of monotonicity and injectivity.

HaLAA
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A one to one function f: ℝ→ℝ is monotone, True or False

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the statement is false, for example: Let I =[0,1]∪[2,3] f(x)=x if x∈[0,1], f(x)=5-x,x∈[2,3]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not defined the value of f(x) outside of I, so the example does not meet the requirements of the question, which include that the domain be all of ##\mathbb{R}##.

I think the statement is false, but a little more work is needed to produce a counterexample.
 
andrewkirk said:
You have not defined the value of f(x) outside of I, so the example does not meet the requirements of the question, which include that the domain be all of ##\mathbb{R}##.

I think the statement is false, but a little more work is needed to produce a counterexample.
Let f(x)=x, x is rational, f(x)=-x,x is irrational, the function is one to one,but it is jumping. Does this example apply?
 
Yes. I thought f(x)=const. would also do, but it depends on whether f has to be strictly monotone or not. Yours is better.
 
Yes, that rational/irrational function is a good one.
By the way, it's possible to extend your function in the OP to a non-monotone, injective function that has the entirety of ##\mathbb{R}## as domain. But the rational/irrational one in post 2 is easier to specify (albeit harder to visualize).
 
andrewkirk said:
(albeit harder to visualize).
Since both are dense, it's just a big X. And it leads to interesting philosophical questions: what one draws is always discrete for you put carbon atoms on the paper. (I apologize, if that remark should be regarded as improper.)
 
It is also an example of a function which is continuous when restricted to 2 dense subsets, but overall not continuous.
 
HaLAA said:
Let f(x)=x, x is rational, f(x)=-x,x is irrational, the function is one to one,but it is jumping. Does this example apply?
Of course you could have f(x) = x outside of the interval (-1, 1) and f(x) = -x on the interval (-1, 1) .

or even simpler :

f(1) = -1, f(-1) = 1, otherwise, f(x) = x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K