One-to-one linear transformations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Why is a linear transformation T(x)=Ax one-to-one if and only if the columns of A are linearly independent?

I don't get it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there no alternative to insanely difficult wikipedia proofs?
 
T is one-to-one if and only if T(x) = T(y) implies x = y, if and only if T(x-y) = 0 implies x - y = 0, if and only if T(v) = 0 implies v = 0. But T(v) is a linear combination of the columns of A, so this says the only way to combine the columns of A to get zero is if the vector of coefficients (v) is zero. In other words, the columns of A are linearly independent.
 
Ahh, thanks Jbunny. It makes perfect sense now!

Micromass: Yes, it was, but the proofs in my book are written similarly to wikipedia - very tiresomely.