One-to-one linear transformations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conditions under which a linear transformation defined by T(x) = Ax is one-to-one, specifically exploring the relationship between one-to-one transformations and the linear independence of the columns of matrix A. The scope includes theoretical aspects of linear algebra and the implications of the rank-nullity theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a linear transformation T(x) = Ax is one-to-one if and only if the columns of A are linearly independent.
  • Another participant suggests consulting the rank-nullity theorem as a hint for understanding the relationship.
  • A participant expresses frustration with the complexity of proofs found in resources like Wikipedia.
  • There is a request for clarification regarding the textbook used and whether it includes a proof of the rank-nullity theorem.
  • One participant outlines a reasoning process indicating that T is one-to-one if T(x) = T(y) implies x = y, leading to the conclusion that the only way to combine the columns of A to yield zero is with a zero vector of coefficients, thus implying linear independence.
  • A participant acknowledges understanding after receiving clarification from another participant.
  • Another participant reiterates their dissatisfaction with the proof style in their textbook, comparing it unfavorably to Wikipedia.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the proofs and concepts involved. While some participants express clarity after discussion, others remain critical of the resources available for learning.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of frustration with the complexity of proofs and the clarity of explanations in their textbooks and online resources. There is an implicit acknowledgment of the need for clearer or alternative explanations of the rank-nullity theorem.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Why is a linear transformation T(x)=Ax one-to-one if and only if the columns of A are linearly independent?

I don't get it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there no alternative to insanely difficult wikipedia proofs?
 
What does your textbook say? What is your textbook?

Do they prove the rank-nullity theorem??
 
T is one-to-one if and only if T(x) = T(y) implies x = y, if and only if T(x-y) = 0 implies x - y = 0, if and only if T(v) = 0 implies v = 0. But T(v) is a linear combination of the columns of A, so this says the only way to combine the columns of A to get zero is if the vector of coefficients (v) is zero. In other words, the columns of A are linearly independent.
 
Ahh, thanks Jbunny. It makes perfect sense now!

Micromass: Yes, it was, but the proofs in my book are written similarly to wikipedia - very tiresomely.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Want to understand how to express the derivative as a matrix
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad Confused about small detail in rank-nullity theorem
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Wronskian: null space equals the span of independent functions
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Undergrad Dimension of a Linear Transformation Matrix
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Linear Transformations: Why w1 is a Linear Combination of v
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Vectors as geometric objects and vectors as any mathematical objects
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Undergrad Can this type of transformation be non-linear?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Graduate linear programming, polyhedron and extreme points
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Undergrad Characterizing linear independence in terms of span
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Combination of Linear Transformations
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K