Rod Alexei
- 29
- 0
What is the reason for this? Is it because of the Earth's rotation?
The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of the Earth's ionosphere being ionized by solar radiation, specifically questioning why only half of the Earth’s ionosphere is affected at any given time. Participants explore the implications of Earth's rotation and visibility in relation to this ionization process.
Participants generally agree that at any given time, only half of the Earth is exposed to solar radiation, which contributes to the ionization of the ionosphere. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the implications of Earth's rotation and whether it affects the proportion of ionization.
Some participants highlight the need for clarity regarding definitions and assumptions related to the ionization process and the visibility of the Earth from the Sun's perspective. There are unresolved questions about the role of Earth's rotation in this context.
If the Earth did not rotate would that change the "half" to another value?Rod Alexei said:What is the reason for this? Is it because of the Earth's rotation?
Hi Rod, please post your source for this so that everyone can read it. Thank you.Rod Alexei said:What is the reason for this? Is it because of the Earth's rotation?
256bits said:If the Earth did not rotate would that change the "half" to another value?
Evo said:Hi Rod, please post your source for this so that everyone can read it. Thank you.
Which is why I asked for the source, it often solves the problem.davenn said:he just has a misunderstanding of the real reason ... which is what 256bits and myself are trying to coax out of him![]()
Evo said:Which is why I asked for the source, it often solves the problem.
Exactly, that might be his first clue that his thinking is wrong. I guess I could word it "Have you actually read this anywhere?" But we ask for sources, because many times, people actually come up with some oddball website that they were reading and we need to explain why it's wrong. Or they read a valid website or book, but they misunderstood what they read. I find it best not to assume that they didn't read, see, or hear something that triggered the thought.davenn said:I don't think there is a "source" as such
Generally, discussion topics should be traceable to standard textbooks or to peer-reviewed scientific literature
Rod Alexei said:Why is it half not any other value ?
256bits said:If the Earth did not rotate would that change the "half" to another value?
davenn said:@Rod Alexei ... have another try ... think about it from an Earth visibility point of view ...
do you now see the reason ?![]()
Rod Alexei said:Only half the tennis ball would be illuminated. (I guess)