How light rays from a fireplace wood fire on Earth compare to the Sun's fire?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the characteristics of light emitted from a wood fire compared to sunlight, particularly focusing on the types of electromagnetic radiation produced, including visible light and ultraviolet rays. Participants also consider the implications of firelight for plant growth and the differences in radiation intensity and spectrum between a wood fire and the Sun.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a wood fire emits ultraviolet rays like the Sun and what types of light are produced by an ordinary fire.
  • It is noted that fire primarily emits red light and infrared radiation, which are perceived as heat, and that plants utilize red and blue light but not intermediate wavelengths.
  • One participant presents a comparison of the light spectra from the Sun and a candle flame, indicating that the peak intensity of a flame is in the infrared region, suggesting limited benefits for plants from flame light.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for cooking plants if they are placed too close to a fire to increase light intensity.
  • Another participant mentions an ornamental tree with black leaves, speculating on its evolutionary advantages and the role of human selection in its maintenance.
  • There is a discussion about the temperature differences between a wood fire and the Sun, leading to different wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation emitted.
  • Some participants assert that the amount of ultraviolet light emitted from a fire is negligible compared to that from the Sun, and that ultraviolet light is primarily responsible for sunburn.
  • Questions arise regarding the emission of ultraviolet light from rare earth gas-lamp mantles, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their spectra.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the types of light emitted by fires and their implications for plant growth. There is no consensus on the specifics of ultraviolet emission from wood fires or the comparative benefits of firelight versus sunlight for plants.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and comparisons, but there are limitations in the discussion regarding the exact wavelengths of ultraviolet light and the specific conditions under which plants might benefit from firelight.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying plant biology, light physics, or anyone curious about the differences in light emission from various sources, particularly in relation to plant growth and health.

Questor2
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
While lying in front of a 500 degree woodfire, I wonder if besides light and heat that we take as ordinary does it also have ultraviolet rays of light like the sun?? What are the types from light from an ordinary on Earth fire?? Would they be beneficial to plants as main light source?, would plants grow by a large firelight if far enough away from the heat?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Fire in general produces red light and infrared. which we perceive as heat.
Plants do make use of red light and also blue, but most plants don't use the intermediate wavelengths. it is reflected;
That is why we see plants as green,
 
Unless you're burning some strange stuff, typical fireplace or candle flame emits predominantly in the red end of the visible spectrum. This graphs compares spectra of the Sun and candle light (and an incadesent lightbulb):
sourcesoflight02.gif

(source: https://osa.magnet.fsu.edu/teachersparents/articles/sourcesoflight.html)
As you can see, the peak intensity is somewhere farther down the infrared regions.

Plants absorb light across the entire visible spectrum, with a slight efficiency dip in the green region.
This means that plants benefit very little from flame light, as it's only providing the red part of the spectrum, and even that at much lower intensity than sunlight.
One could try and increase intensity of the flame light (by putting a plant closer to the fire) so as to provide more energy for the plant to absorb, but due to the excess radiation in the infrared region, it'd also mean cooking the plant.

rootone said:
Plants do make use of red light and also blue, but most plants don't use the intermediate wavelengths. it is reflected;
That as why we see plants as green,
The extracted pigment does not absorb well in the green region, but when inside the overall structure of a leaf, the absorption is quite good:
upload_2018-1-6_4-13-26.png

More on this here:
https://www.heliospectra.com/sites/default/files/general/What%20light%20do%20plants%20need_5.pdf
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-6_4-13-26.png
    upload_2018-1-6_4-13-26.png
    16.6 KB · Views: 2,110
  • sourcesoflight02.gif
    sourcesoflight02.gif
    6.8 KB · Views: 2,550
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and russ_watters
Bandersnatch said:
https://www.heliospectra.com/sites/default/files/general/What%20light%20do%20plants%20need_5.pdf
Thanks for that.
I noticed an ornamental tree that somebody has planted in my neighborhood.
It has completely black leaves when it is growing in summer.
I wonder what it is gaining from that, it appears to be an evolutionary advance on regular photosynthesis,
but most tress simply are not black
 
rootone said:
I noticed an ornamental tree that somebody has planted in my neighborhood.
It has completely black leaves when it is growing in summer.
I wonder what it is gaining from that, it appears to be an evolutionary advance on regular photosynthesis,
but most tress simply are not black

If it is an ornamental plant, it may be maintained because it is human selected. There are ltos of examples of human selected plants that are not optimized for the natural world, such as plants that are variegated for having chloroplasts. Some parts of leaves can be white because they don't have chloroplasts. In the wild, this would be a dis-advantage due to its reduced use of light/leaf area.

What it may be gaining is the human husbandry that keeps it going rather than some metabolic function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Questor2 said:
While lying in front of a 500 degree woodfire, I wonder if besides light and heat that we take as ordinary does it also have ultraviolet rays of light like the sun?? What are the types from light from an ordinary on Earth fire?? Would they be beneficial to plants as main light source?, would plants grow by a large firelight if far enough away from the heat?

What light rays from fire on Earth compared to suns fire?
Ohhh and the sun ISNT on fire :wink:

While lying in front of a 500 degree woodfire,

and there is a huge temperature difference
your wood fire ~ 500 C
the surface of the Sun ~ 6000 C

this results in the very different wavelengths of Electromagnetic radiation
 
Thank you so much -all of you who have replied to my question with much information about plant absorption of light and also the chart comparing sun light to a candle and tungsten lamp and their wave lengths ! That is very helpful :)
But no one said anything about ultraviolet?? I do not know what wavelength it is and if a huge stoveful of red glowing coals emits any? (It is at 500 and 600 F not C) and I get very deeply comfortably hot but don't seem to get a sunburn so I guess no ultraviolet. Is it only the ultraviolet that causes sunburn on people or sunscald on plants or is it the heat also...??
Of course the sun has all kinds of electric magnetic radiation which I don't quite understand except it is like a big nuclear power plant that has caught fire..but with a lot more materials for its use. But it sure looks like its burning when I see pictures of solar flares :)
 
The process going on within the Sun is nuclear fusion;
It produces heat and light with far more energy than a wood fire.
Start with this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion

Some of the Sun's output is in the ultraviolet range but Earth's atmosphere blocks a lot of it.
Ultraviolet light in general is something that is not good for the health of living things, though not deadly.
 
Last edited:
Ultraviolet has even shorter wavelengths than blue light. The amount of UV from a fire (or glowing coals) is completely negligible.

Classical sunburn is a reaction to UV. You can get actual burns from very intense visible light or infrared, but for that you would have to focus the sunlight with a lens on your skin or do similarly stupid things.
 
  • #10
Questor2 said:
But no one said anything about ultraviolet?? I do not know what wavelength it is and if a huge stoveful of red glowing coals emits any?
UV starts roughly below 400 nm, so just to the left of where the graphs end. As you can see, the amount of light a candle emits at 400 nm is tiny as compared to red light (around 700 nm). Further down to the left, in the UV region, the graph keeps going down, while further right (into the infrared - which heats you up) it goes up for a good while more.
Candlelight and coal burn in comparable manner.
 
  • #11
Thank you all again for taking the time to further and more completely answering my question. I don't think I could have found the answer anywhere else but this forum! :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and mfb
  • #12
Do 'rare earth' gas-lamp mantles emit non-trivial UV ? I'm fairly sure basic 'lime light' does not, but my google-fu has failed me, I cannot find their spectra...
 
  • #13
The rare Earth metallic salts in gas-lamp mantles have a very low emissivity and therefore do not emit very much infrared radiation. Most of their light is focused in the visible spectrum. However there is some evidence that candoluminescence aids in it's production of light which has a higher intensity at certain wave lengths than expected by incandescence at the same temperature.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K