Only half the Earth’s ionosphere is being ionized by the Sun

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon that only half of the Earth's ionosphere is ionized by solar radiation. Participants clarify that this is not due to the Earth's rotation but rather the visibility of the Earth to the Sun. The analogy of a tennis ball illuminated by a light source is used to illustrate that regardless of rotation, only one hemisphere is exposed to solar radiation at any given time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the ionization effects on the ionosphere's layers during day and night.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionosphere layers and their functions
  • Basic knowledge of solar radiation and its effects
  • Familiarity with Earth's rotation and its implications
  • Concept of visibility in relation to celestial bodies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of solar radiation on the ionosphere
  • Study the relationship between Earth's rotation and solar exposure
  • Explore the different layers of the ionosphere and their ionization processes
  • Investigate the impact of night and day cycles on ionospheric conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students of atmospheric science, physicists studying solar effects, educators explaining ionospheric phenomena, and anyone interested in the interactions between solar radiation and the Earth's atmosphere.

Rod Alexei
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
What is the reason for this? Is it because of the Earth's rotation?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Rod Alexei said:
What is the reason for this? Is it because of the Earth's rotation?
If the Earth did not rotate would that change the "half" to another value?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Rod Alexei said:
What is the reason for this? Is it because of the Earth's rotation?
Hi Rod, please post your source for this so that everyone can read it. Thank you.
 
256bits said:
If the Earth did not rotate would that change the "half" to another value?

indeed !

@Rod Alexei ... have another try ... think about it from an Earth visibility point of view ...

do you now see the reason ? :smile:Dave
 
Evo said:
Hi Rod, please post your source for this so that everyone can read it. Thank you.

His thread title is correct
He is asking why ... he just has a misunderstanding of the real reason ... which is what 256bits and myself are trying to coax out of him :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
davenn said:
he just has a misunderstanding of the real reason ... which is what 256bits and myself are trying to coax out of him :wink:
Which is why I asked for the source, it often solves the problem.
 
Evo said:
Which is why I asked for the source, it often solves the problem.

I don't think there is a "source" as such ... he's just asking "Is it because of the Earth's rotation"
as in ... I wonder if this is the reason ...
He didn't state ... " I read somewhere that ..." making asking for a source valid

256bit has given a reason why it isn't by getting him to think about a non rotating Earth situation :smile:

Dave
 
davenn said:
I don't think there is a "source" as such
Exactly, that might be his first clue that his thinking is wrong. I guess I could word it "Have you actually read this anywhere?" But we ask for sources, because many times, people actually come up with some oddball website that they were reading and we need to explain why it's wrong. Or they read a valid website or book, but they misunderstood what they read. I find it best not to assume that they didn't read, see, or hear something that triggered the thought.

Btw, when a thread is started it should be fleshed out with reference to an acceptable source unless it is a well known topic. The body of the thread shouldn't be in the title. And fleshing out the thread with all of the facts becomes a learning thread for other members.

From our Guidelines
Generally, discussion topics should be traceable to standard textbooks or to peer-reviewed scientific literature
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Rod Alexei said:
Why is it half not any other value ?

did you read 256bit's comment and ponder it ? ... it seems not
here it is again ...
256bits said:
If the Earth did not rotate would that change the "half" to another value?

and my comment
davenn said:
@Rod Alexei ... have another try ... think about it from an Earth visibility point of view ...

do you now see the reason ? :smile:

get a tennis ball, baseball etc ... what do you notice about the illumination of the ball if held in front of a lit light globe ?

and all your answers are in that link you provided

Dave
 
  • #11
Here's my second try. Thanks for your replies !
I assume the tennis ball would be the earth, and the lit globe would be the sun.
Only half the tennis ball would be illuminated. (I guess)
 
  • #12
Could it be because at a given time, half of the Earth is exposed to solar radiation and the other half is not?
 
  • #13
Well I think I have to agree.
 
  • #14
There is, but the amount of high energy radiation coming from sources other than the Sun is tiny.
 
  • #15
Rod Alexei said:
Only half the tennis ball would be illuminated. (I guess)

exactly :smile:
... so it doesn't matter if the Earth rotates on it's axis or not, only ~1/2 is illuminated

The important thing to note is that what the ionisation is doing to the ionosphere's different layers during the day
compared to the absence of that ionising effect at niteDave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
688
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K