bayakiv
- 92
- 8
I see this through the prism of a materialistic interpretation of action in a closed world.
That's not an ontology. This situation you describe is exactly why to this day QT has no ontology. Shut up and calculate is not an ontology.martinbn said:That the particles/fields exist, in this example the electron.
What is onltology according to you?EPR said:That's not an ontology. This situation you describe is exactly why to this day QT has no ontology. Shut up and calculate is not an ontology.