Operator T, ##T^2=I##, -1 not an eigenvalue of T, prove ##T=I##.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Suppose ##T\in\mathcal{L}(V)## and ##T^2=I## and ##-1## is not an eigenvalue of ##T##. Prove that ##T=I##
Relevant Equations
Since ##T^2=I## then ##T_2-I=0## is the zero operator. Then ##(T+I)(T-I)=0##.
Now, for ##v\in V##, ##(T+I)v=0\implies Tv=-v##. That is, the null space of ##T+I## is formed by eigenvectors of ##T## of eigenvalue ##-1##.

By assumption, there are no such eigenvectors (since ##-1## is not an eigenvalue of ##T##).

Hence, if ##(T-I)v \neq 0## then ##(T+I)(T-I)v\neq 0##.

Thus, For ##(T+I)(T-I)=0## we need to have ##(T-I)v=0## for all ##v \in V##.

##(T-I)v=Tv-v=0\implies Tv=v##

Therefore, it must be that ##T=I##.

This is the solution I came up with.

For comparison, here is another solution. My solution differs from this solution, I just want to make sure my reasoning is correct since my proof seems simpler than the linked solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks fine.
 
You can make it a bit shorter. If the null space of ##T+I## contains only the zero vector. This operator is invertable so ##(T+I)(T-I)=0## implies ##T-I=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix and PeroK
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top