Operator with 3 degenerate orthonormal eigenstates

Click For Summary
The diagonal elements of the operator ##\hat{A}## are confirmed to equal the eigenvalue ##a##, leading to the matrix representation of ##\hat{A}##. The discussion highlights a challenge in deriving the commuting relation due to uncertainty about the off-diagonal terms. It is suggested that any normalized linear combination of the three orthonormal eigenstates remains an eigenstate of ##\hat{A}## with eigenvalue ##a##. Clarification is provided that the relevant equations pertain to the action of ##\hat{A}## on the eigenstates, not their inner products. Understanding these relationships is crucial for addressing the original question posed.
Celso
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I've been given an operator ##\hat{A}## that has 3 orthonormal vectors as degenerate eigenstates corresponding to the same eigenvalue ##a##.

I know how the hamiltonian acts on these vectors and I want to use this information to check whether ##\hat{H}## and ##\hat{A}## commute or not.
Relevant Equations
## \hat{A} |1> a|1>, \hat{A} |2> a|2>, \hat{A} |3> a|3>##
##\hat{H} = \begin{bmatrix} \sigma & 0 & \sigma \\ 0 & \sigma & \delta \\ \sigma & \delta & \sigma \end{bmatrix} ##
With this information I concluded that the diagonal elements of ##\hat{A}## are equal to the eigenvalue ##a##, so ##\hat{A} = \begin{bmatrix} a & A_{12} & A_{13} \\ A_{21}& a & A_{23}\\A_{31} & A_{32} & a \end{bmatrix}## but I can't see how to go from this to the commuting relation, since I don't know the other terms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show that any normalized linear combination of the three orthonormal vectors is also an eigenstate of ##\hat A## with eigenvalue ##a##? If you can, what does this have to do with the question being asked here?
 
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
Celso said:
Relevant Equations:: ## \hat{A} |1> a|1>, \hat{A} |2> a|2>, \hat{A} |3> a|3>##

With this information I concluded that the diagonal elements of ##\hat{A}## are equal to the eigenvalue ##a##, so ##\hat{A} = \begin{bmatrix} a & A_{12} & A_{13} \\ A_{21}& a & A_{23}\\A_{31} & A_{32} & a \end{bmatrix}## but I can't see how to go from this to the commuting relation, since I don't know the other terms.
Note that your relevant equations say ##\hat{A} |n\rangle = a|n\rangle##, not ##\langle n \lvert \hat{A} \rvert n \rangle = a##.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...

Similar threads