Operators On Multivariable Wave Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of inner products involving multivariable wave functions in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the properties of operators and their hermiticity. The context is set within the framework of spherical coordinates and the integration techniques required for such calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of comparing integrals to determine the hermiticity of operators, questioning whether to expand integrals in terms of both angles or just one. There is also exploration of the proper integration elements in spherical coordinates and the implications of integrating over different bounds.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the integration process and the necessity of including specific elements like ##\sin \theta##. There is an ongoing examination of the bounds for integration, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their correctness. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications regarding the mathematical setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating in spherical coordinates, with specific attention to the roles of different angles and the implications for the evaluation of expectation values. There is mention of previous exercises and references to external resources for further clarification.

flyusx
Messages
64
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Are ##\hat{A}=\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}## and ##\hat{B}=\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}## Hermitian? Given ##\psi(\theta,\phi)=\exp(-3i\phi)\cos(\theta)##, evaluate <ψ|Α|ψ>, <ψ|Β|ψ>
Relevant Equations
Hermitian functions can act either on the bra or ket first; non-Hermitian functions do not have tis ability. <φ|ψ>##=\int\phi^{*}\psi##
I know the way to solve the first part is to find <ψ|Αψ> and compare it with <ψΑ|ψ>. This comparison can be done through an integral representation where we take ψ* and act A on ψ to be the integrand, or act A on ψ* and multiply by ψ for the integrand. If the integrals are the same, then the operator is Hermitian. (Another way is to check the eigenvalues and see if they are purely real). My question is: after computing the integrand, do we expand the integral out as a double integral with respect to dφdθ? Or do we only expand it in terms of dθ since the exponential term cancels out? I assume the bounds for the integral will be from 0 to 2π as this would represent a full 'declination and ascension' over space. Knowing this will help me solve both parts.

If it's of any use, this is Exercise 2.52 of Zettili's Quantum Mechanics. I referred to his solved Problem 2.19 to see the best way to represent an inner product, but the wave functions there were solely dependent on x and thus integrated with respect to dx. I couldn't find an example where an inner product of a multivariable wave function was expanded out in integral form.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that you have to work in both ##\theta## and ##\phi##, and integrate with the proper integration element, ##\sin \theta \, d\theta \, d \phi##.
 
I thought $$\langleψ(x)|\hat{A}|ψ(x)\rangle$$ meant $$\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx$$, and ended up figuring out that one does integrate over all elements (for instance, x,y,z or in this case θ,φ). I know that in spherical coordinates, volume integration isn't simply dρdθdφ, but I thought that an expectation value calculation was defined to be ##\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx## over all space.

Either way, I've linked a photo of my solution. The integral was evaluated from 0 to 2π.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    15.6 KB · Views: 82
Last edited:
flyusx said:
I thought $$\langleψ(x)|\hat{A}|ψ(x)\rangle$$ meant $$\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx$$,
##\ket{\psi(x)}## doesn't make sense. ##\ket{\psi}## is an (abstract) vector in Hilbert space, so it doesn't make sense to write it as having a position dependence. To convert to a wave function, you have
$$
\psi(x) = \braket{x | \psi}
$$

flyusx said:
but I thought that an expectation value calculation was defined to be ##\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx## over all space.
If you have, for example, a particle on a ring, "all space" means "anywhere on the ring", which can be parametrized by a single angle ##\theta##.


flyusx said:
Either way, I've linked a photo of my solution. The integral was evaluated from 0 to 2π.
I don't see the ##\sin \theta## in the integration element. Also, you are not showing anything here about hermiticity.
 
A is anti-Hermitian, B is Hermitian. I'd figured that part by myself so I didn't bother to link it. Sorry.

Does ##\sin(θ)## come from spherical integration? I've seen ##ρ^2\sin(θ)## for a volume integral but I can't conceptualise where the sine comes from.
 
Thanks, I checked out the section/page about solid angle. But <ψ|Α|ψ> would be zero as $$\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sin(\theta)\cos^{2}(\theta)\;d\theta d\phi=0$$. <ψ|Β|ψ> would also remain zero. Is this reasonable, or are my integral bounds wrong?
 
flyusx said:
are my integral bounds wrong?
The polar angle ##\theta## runs from ##0## to ##\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
Yes, I am blind. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K