Operators On Multivariable Wave Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the expectation value of operators on multivariable wave functions, specifically using the inner product <ψ|Aψ> and comparing it with <ψA|ψ>. The participants clarify that the integral representation involves integrating over both angles θ and φ, with the correct integration element being sin(θ) dθ dφ. The exercise referenced is Exercise 2.52 from Zettili's "Quantum Mechanics," which emphasizes the importance of proper bounds and integration techniques in spherical coordinates. The conclusion reached is that the polar angle θ should range from 0 to π, while φ ranges from 0 to 2π.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable wave functions
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their integration
  • Experience with expectation values in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about spherical coordinate integration techniques
  • Explore the concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Review Zettili's "Quantum Mechanics" for additional exercises and examples
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working with wave functions, and researchers interested in operator theory and integration in spherical coordinates.

flyusx
Messages
64
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Are ##\hat{A}=\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}## and ##\hat{B}=\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}## Hermitian? Given ##\psi(\theta,\phi)=\exp(-3i\phi)\cos(\theta)##, evaluate <ψ|Α|ψ>, <ψ|Β|ψ>
Relevant Equations
Hermitian functions can act either on the bra or ket first; non-Hermitian functions do not have tis ability. <φ|ψ>##=\int\phi^{*}\psi##
I know the way to solve the first part is to find <ψ|Αψ> and compare it with <ψΑ|ψ>. This comparison can be done through an integral representation where we take ψ* and act A on ψ to be the integrand, or act A on ψ* and multiply by ψ for the integrand. If the integrals are the same, then the operator is Hermitian. (Another way is to check the eigenvalues and see if they are purely real). My question is: after computing the integrand, do we expand the integral out as a double integral with respect to dφdθ? Or do we only expand it in terms of dθ since the exponential term cancels out? I assume the bounds for the integral will be from 0 to 2π as this would represent a full 'declination and ascension' over space. Knowing this will help me solve both parts.

If it's of any use, this is Exercise 2.52 of Zettili's Quantum Mechanics. I referred to his solved Problem 2.19 to see the best way to represent an inner product, but the wave functions there were solely dependent on x and thus integrated with respect to dx. I couldn't find an example where an inner product of a multivariable wave function was expanded out in integral form.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that you have to work in both ##\theta## and ##\phi##, and integrate with the proper integration element, ##\sin \theta \, d\theta \, d \phi##.
 
I thought $$\langleψ(x)|\hat{A}|ψ(x)\rangle$$ meant $$\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx$$, and ended up figuring out that one does integrate over all elements (for instance, x,y,z or in this case θ,φ). I know that in spherical coordinates, volume integration isn't simply dρdθdφ, but I thought that an expectation value calculation was defined to be ##\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx## over all space.

Either way, I've linked a photo of my solution. The integral was evaluated from 0 to 2π.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    15.6 KB · Views: 77
Last edited:
flyusx said:
I thought $$\langleψ(x)|\hat{A}|ψ(x)\rangle$$ meant $$\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx$$,
##\ket{\psi(x)}## doesn't make sense. ##\ket{\psi}## is an (abstract) vector in Hilbert space, so it doesn't make sense to write it as having a position dependence. To convert to a wave function, you have
$$
\psi(x) = \braket{x | \psi}
$$

flyusx said:
but I thought that an expectation value calculation was defined to be ##\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx## over all space.
If you have, for example, a particle on a ring, "all space" means "anywhere on the ring", which can be parametrized by a single angle ##\theta##.


flyusx said:
Either way, I've linked a photo of my solution. The integral was evaluated from 0 to 2π.
I don't see the ##\sin \theta## in the integration element. Also, you are not showing anything here about hermiticity.
 
A is anti-Hermitian, B is Hermitian. I'd figured that part by myself so I didn't bother to link it. Sorry.

Does ##\sin(θ)## come from spherical integration? I've seen ##ρ^2\sin(θ)## for a volume integral but I can't conceptualise where the sine comes from.
 
Thanks, I checked out the section/page about solid angle. But <ψ|Α|ψ> would be zero as $$\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sin(\theta)\cos^{2}(\theta)\;d\theta d\phi=0$$. <ψ|Β|ψ> would also remain zero. Is this reasonable, or are my integral bounds wrong?
 
flyusx said:
are my integral bounds wrong?
The polar angle ##\theta## runs from ##0## to ##\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
Yes, I am blind. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K