Optical computers and the speed of light

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of optical computers and the mechanisms for slowing down signals, both electrical and optical. Participants explore concepts related to memory storage, buffering, and the challenges of creating optical memory systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references an article suggesting that slowing down light is necessary for optical computers and questions whether a similar method exists for slowing down electricity.
  • Another participant clarifies that transistors do not slow down signals but rather control the flow of electricity, suggesting that using RAM or hard drives is a more effective method for delaying signals.
  • A participant mentions the challenges of creating all-optical buffers and notes that while optical memory exists, it is currently limited to read-only formats, with ongoing research into erasable holographic memory.
  • There is a query about how conventional computers handle buffering, indicating a desire for further clarification on the topic.
  • A participant explains that memory in traditional computers involves storing charge on capacitors, which can be read by switching transistors on and off.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of slowing down signals and the current state of optical memory technology. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of optical computers or the best methods for buffering signals.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various methods of signal delay and memory storage without resolving the complexities involved in optical memory systems. The limitations of current optical memory technology and the feasibility of proposed solutions remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in optical computing, signal processing, and memory storage technologies may find this discussion relevant.

111111
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I saw an article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011801683.html which is talking about how creating a device that slows down light would be necessary to make optical computers.

My question is is there already a way to slow down electricity because according to the article this is what transistors do.

Chipmakers long ago perfected the art of traffic control for electricity, using transistors to halt and release electrons at microscopic gates.

If this is true would it be possible to use some kind of electrical device to slow down a television signal by say 5 minutes, so that you could have two antennas one which was normal and one which was slowed down by 5 minutes, and then you could watch every channel just like with a regular TV except it would all be 5 minutes behind.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Note that is says "halt", not "slow down". i.e. they are simply talking about transistor based memories.
There is no need to "slow down" the signal in the antenna (it can be done using a delay line, although a 5 min delay line would be VERY long); it is much better to use a RAM chip or a harddrive. Set-top boxes with HDs (e.g. Tivo) have been around for many years and they can do exactly what you are asking about.

The problem with optical computers is that there is no way to "halt" light for long periods of time, i.e. no one has been able to figure out how to build an "optical memory".
 
All-optical buffers are currently a HUGE headache for people working in this field, as yet no one has come close to designing something remotely feasible.

People have been able to make optical memory, however it is of the read-only variety, I believe researchers are tinkering with the idea of erasable holographic memory to create optical RAM.

Claude.
 
So how do normal computers buffer?
 
Memory is basically storing a small amount of charge on a capcitor.
Because of the high resistance it stays there.
You can use it to switch a transistor on/off to read it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K