Optical tweezers that not always atract but also repel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges faced when using optical tweezers, specifically regarding the attraction and repulsion of beads. The tweezers, coupled with an inverted optical microscope and utilizing an IR laser with a 100X objective (NA 1), exhibit issues with trapping stability and focus. Key problems identified include poor alignment and residual aberrations, particularly spherical aberration and astigmatism. Solutions suggested involve direct imaging of the trap for alignment verification and adjustments to the collimation of the beam expander to improve focus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical tweezers and their operational principles
  • Familiarity with inverted optical microscopes
  • Knowledge of aberrations in optical systems, specifically spherical and astigmatism
  • Experience with laser alignment techniques and beam collimation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for aligning optical tweezers to minimize aberrations
  • Explore techniques for optimizing laser collimation for infinity-corrected objectives
  • Study the characteristics of Airy discs and their significance in optical trapping
  • Investigate the effects of dichroic mirrors on optical tweezers performance
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in optical physics, particularly those working with optical tweezers, microscopy, and laser alignment. This discussion is beneficial for anyone troubleshooting optical trapping systems and improving their performance.

Fioda
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I have the following problem: the optical tweezers attract beads but when the beads get to the trap, they are repelled. Furthermore, when once in a while a bead gets trapped, it goes out of focus.
The tweezers are coupled to an inverted optical microscope. They are made with an IR laser and an aquous immersion 100X objective (NA 1)
Some trick of what to do?
 
Science news on Phys.org
My first guess (based on the information you provide) is that the trap is attractive in 2 dimensions (in the plane of focus) but not in 'z'. Generally, this is caused by poor alignment or incomplete control of residual aberrations, typically spherical and astigmatism.

Directly imaging the trap is essential to ensure good alignment- place a mirror at the sample plane and as you scan through focus, you will easily be able to tell if you have alignment problems.

Edit- your statement that trapped beads appear 'out of focus' also indicate that your tweezer beam isn't properly matched to the objective lens- either not collimated (for infinity-corrected objectives) or otherwise incorrectly aligned.
 
Hi Andy, thanks for your answer. I did what you told me (using a viewer card). I finally could trap beads again BUT out of focus... besides, the laser does not look perfect (I attached a photo). How can I improve the focus of the laser? How can I get rid of residual aberrations?
 

Attachments

yikes... I assume this is the image of the focal spot obtained using a first-surface mirror?

I can see astigmatism and coma- if the spot moves from side to side as you pass through focus, that's confirmation of off-axis aberrations. Those aberrations are often caused by angular misalignment- I have to align the tweezer to within a few arcminutes, and sub-arcmin is ideal.

Ideally, you should see an Airy disc on focus, and concentric circles off-focus- I should be able to post a few pics shortly.

Edit- here they are: one near focus, one past focus
http://imageshack.us/a/img41/7821/focus0000.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img715/741/pastfocus0001.jpg

The vertical stripes (and satellite dots) are, I think, from the dichroic mirror used to couple the tweezer to the microscope. It does not appear to degrade trap performance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks again!
Here are the images of the airy discs. They are not so bad, are they?
However, the trap is still not working properly, and when the beads are trapped (most of the time they go out of the trap but sometime they stay there), they are out of focus. Probably, I can overcome that problem moving the collimation of the beam expander?
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K