1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Optics aperture modeling rect functions

  1. Apr 24, 2014 #1
    I am trying to model a shape T aperture through 2D rect functions. Both the horizontal and vertical 'lines' have length b and width a, and do not overlap. The origin should be taken to be the centre of the vertical line.

    The question has hinted at the function describing the aperture to be cartesian seperable.

    My issues, I think, seem to stem from not knowing how the rect functions can be combined through operations together...

    Here are my thoughts on the vertical 'line' :

    The RHS of it (to the right of the origin) I believe is: [itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex] rect [itex]\frac{y}{b}[/itex] [1]
    Similarly the LHS i think is : -[itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex]rect[itex]\frac{y}{b}[/itex]. [2]

    My problem is then to express these two together. I am not sure how you define [1] + [2].
    Would this be zero?

    Perhaps you should multiply them, in which case I get -[itex]\frac{a^{2}}{4}[/itex] rect[itex]^{2}[/itex] [itex]\frac{y}{b}[/itex]; so to me it then makes more sense to look at [itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex] rect[itex]^{2}[/itex] [itex]\frac{y}{b}[/itex]

    Again I'm not sure how you would define a rect[itex]^{2}[/itex] function.

    Here are my thoughts on the horizontal 'line' :

    First of all, it can not be a single rect function as either the top or bottom line would then be missing.

    I think [itex]\frac{b}{2}[/itex] e[itex]_{2}[/itex] - [itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex]rect[itex]\frac{x}{b}[/itex] for the bottom half, and ([itex]\frac{b}{2}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex] )e[itex]_{2}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{a}{2}[/itex]rect [itex]\frac{x}{b}[/itex] for the top half.

    BUT as said above, the question hints towards the function being Cartesian separable, but in describing the horizontal 'line' I have introduced e[itex]_{2}[/itex] - the unit vector in the y direction. This also doesn't look right in general, as isn't rect a scalar ?


    Many thanks to anyone who can help shed some light .
    !
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 28, 2014 #2
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Optics aperture modeling rect functions
  1. Rect. current loop (Replies: 3)

  2. Circular aperture (Replies: 10)

Loading...