[Optics] Compound microscope (homework quiz)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum resolution of a microscope using a water immersion objective and red light illumination is calculated to be approximately 380nm, using the formula R = 1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor). In this case, λ is 700nm, NAobjective is 1.3, and NAcondensor is 0.95. The maximum achievable numerical aperture (NA) for water is confirmed to be 1.33, while 0.95 is the standard maximum for dry lenses, with only a 2% difference in resolution when varying NAcondensor values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of numerical aperture (NA) in optics
  • Familiarity with the resolution formula R = 1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor)
  • Knowledge of light wavelengths, specifically in the context of microscopy
  • Basic principles of water immersion microscopy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of numerical aperture on microscope performance
  • Learn about the different types of microscope objectives and their specifications
  • Investigate the effects of varying light wavelengths on resolution
  • Explore advanced microscopy techniques that utilize high NA objectives
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, microscopy enthusiasts, and professionals in biological sciences seeking to enhance their understanding of microscope resolution and numerical aperture.

rinalai
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
What is the maximum resolution of a microscope with water immersion microscope objective and red light illumination?
Relevant Equations
R=1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor)
R = 1.22*700nm/(1.3+0.95) ≈ 380nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rinalai said:
Homework Statement:: What is the maximum resolution of a microscope with water immersion microscope objective and red light illumination?
Relevant Equations:: R=1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor)

R = 1.22*700nm/(1.3+0.95) ≈ 380nm
I am not sure about the value of NAobj here. Is it <1.3 when using water-immersion objective?
Also, is NAcond always 0.95, or could it be of other values?
Thank you.
 
Remember that NA for any system in a material of index ##n## is ##n \sin\theta_{max}##. Looking at this formula, what is the largest possible value for the NA?
 
For water(n=1.33) the maximum should be 1.33, right?
How about NAcondensor?
 
Yes, that is correct.

How did you come up with 0.95 for NAcond?
 
I referred to the professor's slide(attached picture),
but don't understand how NAcond was determined..
截圖 2021-11-01 下午12.08.31.png
 
So after doing a little research, it seems 0.95 is considered the maximum achievable NA for a dry lens. I couldn't tell you why it's 0.95 and not 0.96 or 0.94. However, the difference between ##NA_{cond} = 1## and ##NA_{cond} = 0.95## is only a 2% change in the value of the resolution. If you want to play it safe, just use the value of 0.95.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rinalai
Thank you so much for helping out :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K