[Optics] Compound microscope (homework quiz)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the maximum resolution of a microscope using water immersion objectives and red light illumination, specifically focusing on the numerical aperture (NA) values of the objective and condenser lenses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of resolution using the formula R=1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor) and question the appropriateness of the NA values used. There is uncertainty about the maximum achievable NA for water immersion and the specific value for the condenser lens.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the values of numerical apertures and their implications for resolution. Some guidance has been provided regarding the maximum NA for water immersion and the typical value for a dry lens, but there is still exploration of the reasoning behind these values.

Contextual Notes

There is reference to a professor's slide for NA values, and some participants express uncertainty about how these values were determined. The discussion includes a note on the potential variability of NAcondensor values.

rinalai
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
What is the maximum resolution of a microscope with water immersion microscope objective and red light illumination?
Relevant Equations
R=1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor)
R = 1.22*700nm/(1.3+0.95) ≈ 380nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rinalai said:
Homework Statement:: What is the maximum resolution of a microscope with water immersion microscope objective and red light illumination?
Relevant Equations:: R=1.22λ/(NAobjective + NAcondensor)

R = 1.22*700nm/(1.3+0.95) ≈ 380nm
I am not sure about the value of NAobj here. Is it <1.3 when using water-immersion objective?
Also, is NAcond always 0.95, or could it be of other values?
Thank you.
 
Remember that NA for any system in a material of index ##n## is ##n \sin\theta_{max}##. Looking at this formula, what is the largest possible value for the NA?
 
For water(n=1.33) the maximum should be 1.33, right?
How about NAcondensor?
 
Yes, that is correct.

How did you come up with 0.95 for NAcond?
 
I referred to the professor's slide(attached picture),
but don't understand how NAcond was determined..
截圖 2021-11-01 下午12.08.31.png
 
So after doing a little research, it seems 0.95 is considered the maximum achievable NA for a dry lens. I couldn't tell you why it's 0.95 and not 0.96 or 0.94. However, the difference between ##NA_{cond} = 1## and ##NA_{cond} = 0.95## is only a 2% change in the value of the resolution. If you want to play it safe, just use the value of 0.95.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rinalai
Thank you so much for helping out :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K