Optics Problem: A real object and a converging lens

AI Thread Summary
A real object is placed 9.00 cm from a converging lens with a focal length of 24.0 cm, leading to confusion about the image characteristics. The calculations indicate that the image distance (q) is -14.4 cm, suggesting it is virtual, but this contradicts the expected outcome for a converging lens where q should be positive for real images. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the sign conventions in optics, particularly that a negative q indicates a virtual image. Participants also note that the image height is proportional to the image distance, impacting whether the image appears enlarged or inverted. The thread concludes with a suggestion to seek clarification from the professor regarding the discrepancies in the assignment.
anomalocaris
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A real object is placed 9.00 cm from a converging lens that has a focal length of 24.0 cm. The image is________.

My classmate answered "14.4 cm from the lens, virtual, and enlarged," but apparently this is incorrect. I solved it out and chose the option "14.4 cm from the lens, real, and enlarged," though I believe the image should be virtual since my "q" value was negative/<0. I do not have the correct answer since this assignment is still active, so I would really like to understand if I'm taking the wrong steps before my final next week. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated!

Homework Equations



\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q}
where f=focal distance=24.0 cm
p=distance of real object from the mirror=9.0cm
q=distance of image from the mirror

I also know that f>0 for a converging lens and when q>0, the image will be real.

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{1}{24.0 cm} = \frac{1}{9.0 cm} + \frac{1}{q}
and so moving things around: \frac{1}{24.0 cm} - \frac{1}{9.0 cm} = \frac{1}{q}

\frac{1}{q}=-\frac{5}{72}
q=(-\frac{5}{72} )^-1 =-14.4

My q is negative, so it should virtual, but irregardless, the computer finds this answer unfit! I'm still a little confused at knowing if it will be enlarged or not, especially because no heights were given for the object.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your answer is correct. Remember that image height is proportional to the image distance. The greater the distance, the greater the height (it will be upside down though if its real). Therefore, the image will be magnified larger if the image distance is greater than the object distance.
 
I agree with your classmate.
 
Have you tried inserting the answer as -14.4 cm from the lens? Also it would be upright, the image that is.
 
I think my classmate is right as well. The answers are multiple choice, so -14.4 cm is not an option unfortunately. I think my professor "borrows" his questions from other sources and sometimes he changes them slightly but forgets to change the choices of answers. Thank you all, I will have to ask about it in class or office hours.
 
your classmate is correct
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top