Optics Question -- small glass spheres to couple to fiber optic cables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an optics problem involving small glass spheres and their interaction with fiber optic cables. Participants are exploring the principles of refraction, specifically using Snell's Law and geometric considerations to analyze the behavior of light as it passes through the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Snell's Law and the geometry of light paths through the sphere. There are attempts to derive angles of incidence and refraction based on given parameters and to visualize the problem through geometric constructions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the geometric relationships involved and confirming each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of geometry to simplify calculations, and there is ongoing exploration of the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem's parameters, including specific values for indices of refraction and distances, while also questioning the accuracy of their calculations and assumptions about the geometry involved.

izelkay
Messages
115
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


hAvPSJM.png


Homework Equations


I know that yin = 0.7mm, y2 = 0mm, the index of refraction for the sphere is 1.8 and the indices of refraction for the air surrounding it is 1.

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure how to even begin with the given information. I was thinking I could ray-transfer matrix analysis, but how would I set that up for this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What equation comes to mind when one is dealing with refraction between two media?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
What equation comes to mind when one is dealing with refraction between two media?
Snell's Law: n1sinθ1 = n2sin2
But how would I find θ1?
 
For the first refraction, try to draw a line from the sphere center to the entrance point of the incoming ray. You may not need to calculate ##\theta_1##, from the geometry it may be possible to get ##\sin \theta_1## directly in terms of the known data.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
For the first refraction, try to draw a line from the sphere center to the entrance point of the incoming ray. You may not need to calculate ##\theta_1##, from the geometry it may be possible to get ##\sin \theta_1## directly in terms of the known data.
Okay I've determined that sinθ1 = 0.7. Using Snell's law, the refracted ray inside the sphere's
θ2 = sin-1(0.7/1.8) = 22.8854°.

But then how do I get the angle of the incident ray when it exits the sphere? I'm just not seeing the geometry.
 
izelkay said:
But then how do I get the angle of the incident ray when it exits the sphere? I'm just not seeing the geometry.
Now connect three points, the entrance point, exit point, and sphere center, what kind of triangle do you get?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Now connect three points, the entrance point, exit point, and sphere center, what kind of triangle do you get?
An isosceles triangle. So the angle of the incident ray angle when it exits the sphere is the same as the refracted angle when it enters the sphere, θ2 = θ3 = 22.8854°. Trying to find the height it leaves the sphere now, I cut the triangle in two and using the refracted angle and radius, determine that the distance the ray traveled in the sphere is 1.84257 mm. The bottom angle of the isosceles angle is 180-22.8854°-22.8854° = 134.229°

If I draw a line straight from where the ray left the sphere I can determine the height. Using the geometry of the line, the left angle of this triangle should be 180° - θ1 - 134.229° = 1.34376° Then the height is 1mm*sin(1.34376°) = 0.023451 mm.

Is that correct so far? The height seems too small to me.
 
I think you are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: izelkay
blue_leaf77 said:
I think you are correct.
Okay, and then I can use snell's law again to determine, θ4, the refracted exit ray's angle. Then I can say 0.023451mm*tan(θ4) = f [mm]
 
  • #10
izelkay said:
Okay, and then I can use snell's law again to determine, θ4, the refracted exit ray's angle. Then I can say 0.023451mm*tan(θ4) = f [mm]
Oh that's not quite right. I need to take 180 - θ4 - upper angle of height triangle from before. Then I can say 0.023451mm*tan(θ) = f [mm], and I'm getting 0.0025 mm as the focal length.
 
  • #11
izelkay said:
0.0025 mm as the focal length
I guess you put one zero more than it is needed behind the decimal.
 
  • #12
blue_leaf77 said:
I guess you put one zero more than it is needed behind the decimal.
Yep my mistake, 0.025 mm. Thanks for your help; much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K