Optimal Tilt Angle of Solar Array

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the tilt angle of a solar PV array system, specifically a single-axis tracker, to minimize the angle of incidence (AOI) with the sun's rays. The formula for calculating AOI is provided, incorporating variables like axis tilt, rotation, and sun angles. The user seeks to find the optimal rotation value (Y) that results in the lowest AOI, suggesting the need to take a derivative of the equation and set it to zero to identify maxima or minima. Concerns about the complexity of the equation are expressed, highlighting the challenge of the mathematical approach. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of precise modeling for solar energy efficiency.
drogerssolar
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I have a difficult problem I have been working with recently. I have been trying to model the ever changing position of a solar PV array system. The system is a single axis tracker and orientates itself to have the smallest angle of incidence(AOI) to the suns beam as possible (the best performance is when the suns beam is directly perpendicular to the array). Also to clarify the AOI is the angle between the array planes "normal" and the suns direct beam.

I was able to determine how to calculate the AOI using the following formula:

COS[AOI] = {COS[X]*COS[Y]*COS[Z]} + {SIN[ACOS[COS[X]*COS[Y]]*SIN[Z]*COS[W-ACOS[ATAN[SIN[Y]/TAN[X]]*COS[Y]]]}

Where:
X = Axis Tilt = 35 degrees (for my application)
Y = Rotation about the axis (This is my unknown)
Z = Zenith angle of sun for a particular time of day
W = Azimuth angle of sun for the same time of day
AOI = Angle of incidence

Now my goal here is to determine what value of Y will give me the smallest possible value of AOI.
I think that I need to take a derivative of the equation with respect to AOI and then set the resulting derivative = 0.
Does that sound right? I know that this is a Maxima/Minima problem but the size of the equation frightens me.
Any guidance would be very much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
drogerssolar said:
Hello!

I have a difficult problem I have been working with recently. I have been trying to model the ever changing position of a solar PV array system. The system is a single axis tracker and orientates itself to have the smallest angle of incidence(AOI) to the suns beam as possible (the best performance is when the suns beam is directly perpendicular to the array). Also to clarify the AOI is the angle between the array planes "normal" and the suns direct beam.

I was able to determine how to calculate the AOI using the following formula:

COS[AOI] = {COS[X]*COS[Y]*COS[Z]} + {SIN[ACOS[COS[X]*COS[Y]]*SIN[Z]*COS[W-ACOS[ATAN[SIN[Y]/TAN[X]]*COS[Y]]]}

Where:
X = Axis Tilt = 35 degrees (for my application)
Y = Rotation about the axis (This is my unknown)
Z = Zenith angle of sun for a particular time of day
W = Azimuth angle of sun for the same time of day
AOI = Angle of incidence

Now my goal here is to determine what value of Y will give me the smallest possible value of AOI.
I think that I need to take a derivative of the equation with respect to AOI and then set the resulting derivative = 0.
Does that sound right? I know that this is a Maxima/Minima problem but the size of the equation frightens me.
Any guidance would be very much appreciated.

How is this related to your other thread that you have going on this subject?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=497570

.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
849
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K