Optimisation along a curve on a surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on an optimization problem involving a 2D surface defined by the function F(σ,κ) in ℝ3, where the goal is to find the minimum of F along a continuous curve γ. The user has a closed-form analytic expression for F, including its first and second partial derivatives, and is working within a Riemannian manifold of constant Gaussian curvature. The challenge lies in the constraint of moving only along the curve γ, which complicates the search for the global optimum of F.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly Riemannian manifolds.
  • Familiarity with optimization techniques in constrained environments.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications in optimization problems.
  • Experience with geodesics and arc elements in curved spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research optimization methods on Riemannian manifolds, focusing on techniques like gradient descent along curves.
  • Explore the use of Lagrange multipliers for constrained optimization problems.
  • Study the implications of Gaussian curvature on optimization strategies in differential geometry.
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating solutions to optimization problems on manifolds.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working on optimization problems in differential geometry, particularly those dealing with Riemannian manifolds and constrained optimization scenarios.

Vasileios
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

First of all I am not sure if I have chosen the right category for this posting but this looked the most reasonable out.
I have a problem that I would like to solve but I am not sure where to look for answers. It seems like something other people might have worked with before but I am not sure what these types of problems are called.


(Please do excuse the abuse of any notation since I am only learning now about diff. geometry and such).

Basically it is an optimization problem. I have a 2d surface y= F(σ,κ) in ℝ3 and on that surface I have a curve γ. I do not have a parameterisation for the curve, but it is continuous and I can sample it at any point P (see illustration).
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/9179/surfacekq.png



My task is:

Given a random initial point P0 on γ, to find the minimum of F along γ.
I can only move along this (blue) curve γ, backwards or forwards. So the only thing I can adjust is my step length λ.

Now of course I can use various heuristics to solve this, but there must be a more elegant way to solve this problem and someone must have seen these class of problems before.

I do have a closed form analytic expression for the whole F(σ,κ) as well as the first and second partial derivatives at each point. Also note that I have expressions for geodesics, arc elements, Riemmanian metric etc.

Can someone point me to the right direction?

Many thanks
V.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vasileios said:
I do have a closed form analytic expression for the whole F(σ,κ) as well as the first and second partial derivatives at each point. Also note that I have expressions for geodesics, arc elements, Riemmanian metric etc.
Hi just a further clarification.
The actual objective surface F is defined on a Riemmanian manifold W of constant Gaussian curvature. So it is more like in the picture
http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/2443/manifoldm.jpg But I can still only move along a line. I cannot chose a direction to get to the global optimum of F, bhttps://www.physicsforums.com/editpost.php?do=editpost&p=3737946ut only the "global optimum" of the curve γ.I guess I could try to look at this problem in the easier case for a Euclidean space and then try the manifold approach. But still, the fact that I can only move on a pre-defined curve gives me a bit of trouble.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K