Optimization greatest possible volume Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the greatest possible volume of a rectangular box inscribed in an ellipsoid defined by the equation 96x^2 + 4y^2 + 4z^2 = 36. The original poster is exploring the relationship between the box's dimensions and the ellipsoid's constraints.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the volume of the box in terms of its dimensions and the ellipsoid's equation, leading to a volume function that they differentiate to find critical points. They express concern about the complexity of the algebra involved in finding these points.

Discussion Status

Some participants are engaging with the original poster's calculations, asking for details about the partial derivatives they computed. Others suggest alternative methods, such as using Lagrange multipliers, indicating a variety of approaches being considered without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions difficulty in finding critical points and expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their initial steps. There is also a suggestion that the original poster may not have encountered certain methods, like Lagrange multipliers, which could be relevant to the problem.

nrm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Question: [ A rectangular box, whose edges are parallel to the coordinate axes, is inscribed in the ellipsoid 96x^2 + 4y^2 + 4z^2 = 36, What is the greatest possible volume for such a box ]

I realize that the volume of the box: V = (2x)(2y)(2z) = 8xyz
Thus far I've solved for z^2 in the equation of the ellipsoid and then squared the volume so that I could make the substitution easier
V^2 = 64(x^2)(y^2)(9-24x^2-y^2)
Then I've taken the partial derivates of this to look cor critical points, but here I get an algebraic nightmare and can't find critical points. I'm wondering if my initial steps are correct, it's the only thing I could think of doing.

Any help would be great. thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what did you get for the partials
 
Partial with respect to x:
1152x(y^2)-6144(x^3)(y^2)-128x(y^4)

y
1152(x^2)y-3072(x^4)y-256(x^2)(y^3)
 
The partial derivative of
64(x^2)(y^2)(9-24x^2-y^2)
with respect to x is, by the product rule,
128xy^2(9- 24x^2- y^2)- 3072x^3y
set that equal to 0 and you should be able to do a lot of cancelling.

I would do this problem with "Lagrange multipliers" but you may not have had that yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K