Multivariable calculus: Maximization of volume of box with constraint

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum volume of a rectangular box inscribed in a hemisphere of radius R can be determined by maximizing the function V = 8xy(R^2 - x^2 - y^2)^(1/2) under the constraint R^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2. The box dimensions are defined as 2x, 2y, and z, leading to the volume formula V = 4xyz. The critical points must be found on the boundary due to the constraint, and the solution involves differentiating the volume with respect to x and y, then setting the derivatives to zero. This approach avoids the use of Lagrange multipliers, which are not permitted in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with volume calculations for geometric shapes
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques in multiple dimensions
  • Ability to work with constraints in optimization problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers for future optimization problems
  • Learn about polar coordinates and their applications in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the implications of constraints in optimization scenarios
  • Investigate the geometric properties of hemispheres and their relation to inscribed shapes
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as anyone involved in optimization problems related to geometry.

mirajshah
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the maximum possible volume of a rectangular box inscribed in a hemisphere of radius R? Assume that one face of the box lies in the planar base of the hemisphere.

NOTE: For this problem, we're not allowed to use Lagrange multipliers, since we technically haven't learned them yet. I know this is a pain, but please help me out!

Homework Equations



Volume\, of\, hemisphere\, = \frac{2}{3}R^{3}<br /> \\ Volume\, of\, rectangular\, box=xyz
(assuming width x, length y, height z)

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I've written on my sheet so far:
Assume x,yz is the intersection point of the top vertex of the box with the curved surface of the hemisphere in quadrant I.
\Rightarrow\text{Dimensions of box}=2x\times2y\times z <br /> \\ \Rightarrow\text{Volume of box}=4xyz
If hemisphere has radius R,
R=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}} <br /> \\ \Rightarrow R^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}
where R is constant for the purposes of maximization.

Therefore, maximize f\left(x,y,z\right)=4xyz with constraint R^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}

f_{x}=4yz<br /> \\ f_{y}=4xz <br /> \\ f_{z}=4xy <br /> \\ f_{x}=f_{y}=f_{z}=0 <br /> \\ \Rightarrow x=y=z=0
Since this constitutes a non-existant box, the interior critical point is not the global maximum. We must find critical points on the boundary.

Here is where I'm stuck :confused:. How do you find critical points on this kind of boundary function? Do you convert to polar coordinates? Obviously the coordinates are going to be in terms of R, but how do you eliminate x,y,z from the equations describing the coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why 4xyz? Since each edge has length twice the corresponding coordinate, shouldn't the volume be 8xyz?

Also, what you have done completely ignores the constraint. Since, allowing x, y, and z to be any numbers, the box can have arbitrarily large volume what you found was the only extremum, the minimum possible volume.

Since you are not allowed to use Lagrange multipliers, the best thing to do is to use the constraint to get, say, z= \sqrt{R^2- x^2- y^2} and put that into the formula for volume of the box: V= 8xyz= 8xy(R^2- x^2- y^2)^{1/2}. Differentiate that with respect to x and y and set the derivatives equal to 0.
 
HallsofIvy, you're completely correct in that I ignored the constraint. My main problem was I had a mental gap in figuring out how to integrate the extremum into the equation. Thanks for the help though, now I've got my answer!

Also, note that the question states that the box is contained within a "hemisphere". Since we are assuming that the box is centered at the origin, and the hemisphere is radiated outwards from the origin, we can safely assume that 2 dimensions will have twice the length of their radial components (going "horizontally across" the dome). However the third dimension of the box extends only to the base of the hemisphere (goes "vertically up" the dome). If the third dimension of the box was also twice the length of its radial component, the box would be contained within a sphere, not a hemisphere.

I appreciate the response though! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K