Optimization problem - Trouble differentiating function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an optimization problem involving the efficiency of a screw, represented by a function that depends on the angle of pitch and a coefficient of friction. Participants are attempting to find the angle that maximizes this efficiency function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate the efficiency function using the quotient rule but encounters difficulties. They present two different derivative expressions and seek clarification on their correctness.
  • Some participants question the derivatives provided and offer their own calculations, suggesting that errors may have occurred in the original poster's work.
  • There is a discussion about setting the derivative equal to zero to find critical points, with one participant noting that the variable remains in the equation, indicating a potential issue with the solution process.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks guidance on their calculations.

Eonfluxx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Optimization problem -- Trouble differentiating function

Homework Statement


The efficiency of a screw, E, is given by
E=[tex]\frac{(\Theta - \mu\Theta^{2})}{\mu + \Theta} , \Theta > 0[/tex]
where [tex]\Theta[/tex] is the angle of pitch of the thread and [tex]\mu[/tex] is the coefficient of friction of the material, a (positive) constant. What value of [tex]\Theta[/tex] maximizes E?


Homework Equations


[tex]\frac{f'g-g'f}{g^{2}}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I know what to do once I have the derivative of the function, but for this particular function I've had trouble using the quotient rule (I didn't know how to turn it into the product rule, that would have been nice too). I came up with two possibilities and any help would be appreciated:
[tex]\frac{dE}{d\Theta}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\mu - \mu^{2}2\Theta - \mu2\Theta^{2} - \Theta + \mu\Theta^{2}}{(\mu + \Theta)^{2}}[/tex]

and I also came up with

[tex]\frac{dE}{d\Theta}= \frac{-\mu2\Theta - 2\Theta^{2}}{(\mu + \Theta)^{2}}[/tex]

any help on which could be correct (or both wrong) would be greatly appreciated. I've read these forums a lot before and finally have a question of my own. Thanks for reading/help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't get either one.
[tex]\frac{d}{d\theta}\left(\frac{\theta - \mu \theta ^2}{\mu + \theta}\right)~=~\frac{(\mu + \theta)(1 - 2\mu \theta) - (\theta - \mu \theta ^2)(1)}{(\mu + \theta)^2}~=~\frac{\mu - 2\mu^2 \theta - \mu \theta^2}{(\mu + \theta)^2}[/tex]

Man, that's a lot of work to get all those Greek letters looking good!
 


Bah, I made a distributing error which would result in a -[tex]\Theta[/tex] and +[tex]\Theta[/tex] canceling out, thanks a lot!
And thanks, it makes it easier to read

Now when setting [tex]\frac{dE}{d\Theta}[/tex] equal to zero I came up with:

[tex]\Theta[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-\mu}{-2\mu^{2} - \mu\Theta}[/tex]

Is this correct? Thanks again for reading/help
 


No, for the reason that you haven't really solved for theta - it's still present on the right side of your equation.
[tex]\mu - 2\mu^2 \theta - \mu \theta^2~=~ 0[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow \mu (1 - 2\mu \theta - \theta^2)~=~ 0[/tex]

So either [itex]\mu[/itex] = 0 or the quadratic is 0. Use the quadratic formula to solve
[tex]\theta^2 + 2\mu \theta - 1 ~=~ 0[/tex]
(I switched the signs to make solving it easier. Both equations have the same solutions.)
 


Got it, thanks again! I'll be back in the future
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K