Optimization problem using derivatives

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the dimensions of a conical drinking cup to minimize surface area while maintaining a fixed volume of 100 cubic inches. The surface area equation is derived, and attempts to find its derivative lead to complex expressions that are difficult to solve. Participants suggest that retaining symbols during calculations can simplify the process, and alternative approaches to derive the relationship for minimized surface area are explored. One participant successfully derives a simplified relation for the radius in terms of volume, indicating a more efficient method. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the challenges of calculus in optimization problems and the value of different algebraic strategies.
physicsernaw
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We want to make a conical drinking cup out of paper. It should hold exactly 100 cubic inches of water. Find the dimensions of a cup of this type that minimizes the surface area.

Homework Equations


SA = pi*r^2 + pi*r*l where l is the slant height of the cone.

V = 1/3pi*r^2*h = 100

The Attempt at a Solution



I solve l in terms of h and r.

l = sqrt(r^2 + h^2)

Then I solve h in terms of r in the volume, and I get:

h = 300/pi*r^2

plugging this equation for h back in the equation for l, I get:

l = sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2))

SA(r) = pi*r^2 + pi*r*sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2))

Then taking the derivative and setting it equal to zero:

SA'(r) = 2pi*r + pi*sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2)) + 1/2*pi*r/(sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2)))*(2r + 600/(pi*r^3)) = 0

Instead of trying to solve that ugly thing myself I plugged it into wolfram and it said no real solutions exist so I'm obviously doing something wrong. Any help pleasE?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you drink from the cup when you have the lid on?
 
Man, I hate math... lol. Thanks.
 
Is there also an easier way to do this than the way I'm doing it? I get such long, ugly derivatives and finding the zeros is really tedious and time consuming... This is an exam review problem so I don't think the problem should take this long. Is there another approach I could use?

edit: I do get the right answer though, despite it taking a long time.
 
1. What you consider "long time" might not be felt like "long time" by others
2. Since you haven't really, posted the manner in which you've done your algebraic manipulations, no one can give you a "short cut", because we cannot see the algebraic pathways you actually chose to walk along..
 
Well, let's see if I can simplify the algebra a bit, on the spur of the moment:
\frac{dl}{dr}=\frac{r+h\frac{dh}{dr}}{l}
Thus, the optimizing equation becomes, effectively:
l+r\frac{dl}{dr}=0
That is:
l^{2}+r^{2}+rh\frac{dh}{dr}=0 (*)
Furthermore, we have:
\frac{dh}{dr}=-\frac{2}{r}h
therefore, (*) transmutes to:
2r^{2}-h^{2}=0

This ought to be correct simplfication.
 
Since h=\frac{3V}{\pi{r^{2}}}, we have:
r^{3}=\frac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}
that is,
r=(\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}\pi})^{\frac{1}{3}}V^{\frac{1}{3}}
as our relation for minimized surface, given fixed volume of the open cone.
 
Last edited:
I would have never thought of doing it in that way..

Thanks for the insight and taking the time to help me..
 
  • #10
physicsernaw said:
I would have never thought of doing it in that way..

Thanks for the insight and taking the time to help me..
Very often, retaining symbols for butt-ugly expressions will simplify the computation relative to substituting the symbol with original butt-ugliness. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K