Finding the Rate of Change of Water Height in a Filling Cylindrical Tank

  • Thread starter Thread starter starstruck_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a related rates problem involving a cylindrical tank being filled with water. The original poster is attempting to determine how fast the height of the water is increasing given a specific rate of volume change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between volume and height in the context of a cylindrical tank, questioning the correct application of derivatives and the variables involved. There is discussion about the notation used for derivatives and the need to differentiate with respect to time.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on proper notation and the differentiation process. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly express the relationship between volume and height, with some participants suggesting simplifications and emphasizing the importance of units in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of related rates, with specific attention to constants in the problem, such as the radius of the tank and the value of pi. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's struggles with interpreting the problem and applying the correct mathematical principles.

starstruck_
Messages
185
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



((I cannot, for the love of life, understand related rates, so please bear with me. Thank you! ))

A cylindrical tank with radius 5m is being filled with water at a rate of 3m3/min. How fast is the height of the water increasing?

I'm having trouble interpreting this question - actually, most related rates questions, having trouble differentiating between what I would call the volume and what not.

Homework Equations


v= (pi)r2h

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I'm going to say that I know the rate of change of the volume - which means I need to get the height in terms of the volume?

since v= (pi)r2h
h= v/((pi)r2)

h' = (dy/dx [v]((pi)r2) - dy/dx[(pi)r2](v))/((pi)2r4)
h' = (3(2pir^2) - 2pirv)/ ((pi)2r4)I'm pretty sure this is wrong since I ended up with a "v" in my numerator which I don't know the value of.
How would I go about solving this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your dy/dx? You have no variable called x nor one called y in your expressions.
 
Orodruin said:
What is your dy/dx? You have no variable called x nor one called y in your expressions.
I probably shouldn't have written that, my bad - I just meant to use it as a way to say derivative of.

so, derivative of volume multiplied by the denominator minus the derivative of the denominator multiplied by the volume, over the denominator squared.
 
starstruck_ said:
I probably shouldn't have written that, my bad - I just meant to use it as a way to say derivative of.
I am sorry, but that is a really bad notation. What you want to do is to take the derivative of the expression with respect to time ##t##. That derivative operator should be written ##d/dt##, not anything else. You need to specify what you are taking the derivative with respect to. There is no general "derivative of".

Also, think about what variables in your expression actually depend on ##t##. The derivatives of the other variables with respect to ##t## are going to be zero.
 
Orodruin said:
I am sorry, but that is a really bad notation. What you want to do is to take the derivative of the expression with respect to time ##t##. That derivative operator should be written ##d/dt##, not anything else. You need to specify what you are taking the derivative with respect to. There is no general "derivative of".

Also, think about what variables in your expression actually depend on ##t##. The derivatives of the other variables with respect to ##t## are going to be zero.
so would it be d/dt[v](piR^2)/(pi^2R^4) ?
Does this mean my reasoning was correct? I messed up with the actual derivative part, but I've been having much more trouble understanding what to do or what reasoning is correct
 
Your idea of taking the derivative of the expression for h is correct, yes. I am still not completely sure what you mean by your expression. Can you insert the numbers to get the final result so that we can be sure?
 
I am still not completely sure what you mean by your expression. Can you insert the numbers to get the final result so that we can be sure?[/QUOTE]

I got the same answer as the textbook after plugging in my answers but if I take the expression I came up with:
d/dt[v](piR^2)/(pi^2R^4)

d/dt[v] = 3
R = 5
so: [3(pi)(25)]/[(pi)2(625)]
= 3/25(pi)
 
starstruck_ said:
so would it be d/dt[v](piR^2)/(pi^2R^4) ?
Does this mean my reasoning was correct? I messed up with the actual derivative part, but I've been having much more trouble understanding what to do or what reasoning is correct
Note that ##r## is a constant in this problem. So is ##\pi##!

This is the first time I've ever seen anyone differentiate ##\pi##.

You don't differentiate constants.
 
PeroK said:
Note that ##r## is a constant in this problem. So is ##\pi##!

This is the first time I've ever seen anyone differentiate ##\pi##.

You don't differentiate constants.

I didn't differentiate ##\pi##. It was being multiplied so I kept it as is but I did differentiate r which I wasn't supposed to.
 
  • #10
I would suggest the following:
  • You are overcomplicating your answer by not cancelling the ##\pi R^2## from your numerator with the corresponding terms in the denominator.
  • You should always use units. This will help you along by giving you a consistency check in your answer.
In this case, the units would give you dv/dt = 3 m^3/min (you really should write it like this rather than d/dt[v]), R = 5 m, R^2 = 25 m^2. Hence
$$
\frac{dv}{dt}\frac{1}{\pi R^2} = \frac{3\ \mbox{m}^3/\mbox{min}}{\pi (25 \ \mbox{m}^2)} = \frac{3}{25\pi} \ \mbox{m/min}.
$$
 
  • #11
starstruck_ said:
I didn't differentiate ##\pi##. It was being multiplied so I kept it as is but I did differentiate r which I wasn't supposed to.
Okay, I see what you did now.
 
  • #12
Also, note that you can also differentiate before you solve for ##h##, it will give you the same result. (Writing ##v'(t)## and ##h'(t)## rather than ##dv/dt## and ##dh/dt##)
$$
v(t) = \pi R^2 h(t) \quad \Longrightarrow \quad v'(t) = \pi R^2 h'(t).
$$
Then ##h'(t)## is just the rate you are after and so you can solve for it in terms of ##v'(t)##, which you have.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: starstruck_ and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K