Optimized Solving a Physics Word Problem - Can You Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics word problem involving energy conservation and circular motion. The initial equations presented by the user are critiqued for clarity and unit consistency, particularly regarding the relationship between coordinates and force. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly aligning forces and understanding the role of tension in circular motion. They guide the user to relate variables to angles and clarify the distinction between radial and tangential forces. Ultimately, the user arrives at a solution of 41 degrees, indicating successful problem resolution.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
I added two pictures.. One of the word problem and one of my diagram I made..

My work:

1.Wnet = Kf - Ki
-Ugf = Kf... -mgy = mv^2/2 ... - gy = v^2/2

2. x^2 + y^2 = 1780^2
dy/dx = -x/y = velocity (v) at point (x,y)

3. gy = x^2/(2y^2)

4. gy = (1780^2 - y^2)/(2y^2)

... anyways... I know this must be totally wrong..

Can someone please help me answer this problem?
 

Attachments

  • TARZAN.jpg
    TARZAN.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 433
  • Graph.png
    Graph.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 483
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Miike012! :smile:

I have difficulty making sense of what you did.
What do the dots for instance mean in (1)?

And if x and y are coordinates in (2), how did you relate them to a force of 1780 N.
These things have different units and can not be compared...

Anyway, let's start with the relevant equations.
1. Conservation of kinetic and potential energy
2. Centripetal acceleration

Can you write those in formula form?

Next is the decomposition of the forces into aligned forces.
Which forces are there to start with?
 
1.Wnet = delta K
Ugi - Ugf = Kf - Ki
-Ugf = Kf

-gy = v^2/2

2.a = v^2/r

3. SumFy = Ty - w = (m)(ay)
4. SumFx = Tx = (m)(ax)

Are these correct equations?
 
"And if x and y are coordinates in (2), how did you relate them to a force of 1780 N."

I related 1780 to (x,y) by saying the end point of tension started at the origin, and because the motion is a circle I gave the following equation...
x^2 + y^2 = 1780^2... which relates it to x and y... would this not be correct?
 
Miike012 said:
1.Wnet = delta K
Ugi - Ugf = Kf - Ki
-Ugf = Kf

-gy = v^2/2

Right!

Can you write y in terms of theta?


Miike012 said:
2.a = v^2/r

Yes.
You need to relate this to your forces.

Miike012 said:
3. SumFy = Ty - w = (m)(ay)
4. SumFx = Tx = (m)(ax)

Are these correct equations?

Yes, these are correct equations.

However, I suggest you try to find the forces aligned with the rope.
The tension is already aligned.
If you find the component of the weight aligned with the rope, you can find the resulting force along the rope.
The resulting force along the rope must match the centripetal acceleration.
 
Miike012 said:
"And if x and y are coordinates in (2), how did you relate them to a force of 1780 N."

I related 1780 to (x,y) by saying the end point of tension started at the origin, and because the motion is a circle I gave the following equation...
x^2 + y^2 = 1780^2... which relates it to x and y... would this not be correct?

Can it be that you intended Tx^2 + Ty^2 = 1780^2?

x and y would be coordinates that have "meter" as the unit.
1780 is the critical tensional forces that has "Newton" as the unit.

Tx and Ty would be the cartesian force components of the tensional force.
They also have "Newton" as the unit.
 
3. SumFx = T - wx = (m)(ax)
4. SumFy = -wy = (m)(ay)

like that?
 
Miike012 said:
3. SumFx = T - wx = (m)(ax)
4. SumFy = -wy = (m)(ay)

like that?

Yes.

Can you relate those quantities to the angle theta?
 
While I relate the equations the theta.. I was wondering, how come in some situations in circular motion sometimes the SumFy or SumFx has zero acceleration??
 
  • #10
Miike012 said:
While I relate the equations the theta.. I was wondering, how come in some situations in circular motion sometimes the SumFy or SumFx has zero acceleration??

In circular motion the radial force is not zero, or it won't be circular motion.
The tangential force can be zero, and indeed is zero if we're talking about "uniform" circular motion.
 
  • #11
Tan(theta) = wx/wy

cos(theta) = (...)/T
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Here was my reasoning

Tx should be T
 

Attachments

  • tri.png
    tri.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 465
  • #13
Right.

But I'm getting confused with what x and y stand for exactly.
So I'll use "radial" and "tangential" to keep things clear.

What I was looking for is:
wradial = w sin(θ)

And in your earlier equation for the conservation of energy:
g (L sin(θ)) = v^2/2

These need to be combined with:
Fradial = m acentripetal

Can you work that out?
 
  • #14
T- (wy)Tan(theta = (m)(ax)
-(wx)Cot(theta) = (m)(ay)
 
  • #15
ok ill work on that
 
  • #16
F(radial) = m(2*g*L*(wradial/w))/r
 
  • #17
Miike012 said:
F(radial) = m(2*g*L*(wradial/w))/r

How did you get that?
And what happened to the tensional force T?
 
  • #18
im saying x and y because i labeled it with the following axis..
 

Attachments

  • axis.png
    axis.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 462
  • #19
Miike012 said:
im saying x and y because i labeled it with the following axis..

Ah, okay!
 
  • #20
sin(θ) = wradial/w

g (L sin(θ)) = v^2/2
g(L*wradial/w) = v^2/2
v^2 = g(L*wradial/w)(2)

Fradial = m acentripetal = m(v^2/r)
Fradial = m (g(L*wradial/w)(2)/r)
 
  • #21
And I am not sure what Fradial is
im guessing its the tension and wradial
 
  • #22
Miike012 said:
And I am not sure what Fradial is
im guessing its the tension and wradial

Yes.

The total radial force Fradial = T - wradial.

Furthermore this force has to match the radial acceleration. So:
Fradial = m acentripetal

I you can rewrite this in only numbers and theta, you can solve for theta.
 
  • #23
Miike012 said:
sin(θ) = wradial/w

g (L sin(θ)) = v^2/2
g(L*wradial/w) = v^2/2
v^2 = g(L*wradial/w)(2)

Fradial = m acentripetal = m(v^2/r)
Fradial = m (g(L*wradial/w)(2)/r)

Ah, okay.

Note that your r is the radius of the circular motion, which is equal to the length of the rope.
So r=L.

I'm afraid that eliminating theta does not help you forward though.
You should leave the sin(θ) in.

What you do need is that Fradial = T - wradial.
 
  • #24
Thank you finally got it...
Sin(theta) = T/(m*g*2 + w)
 
  • #25
How in the world did you piece everything together?? I was sitting here thinking I had to use the sum tan-gentle force equation...?
 
  • #26
Miike012 said:
Thank you finally got it...
Sin(theta) = T/(m*g*2 + w)

Good!

But there's still something to be done...
What is the relation between m*g and w?


Miike012 said:
How in the world did you piece everything together?? I was sitting here thinking I had to use the sum tan-gentle force equation...?

Well, I guess there is a method to it.

First list all your data and relevant equations.

Then consider what the critical condition is.
In this case that the total radial force exceeds the critical threshold.
This will give you a formula.

And then use your data and relevant equations to find the unknown that is asked for.
 
  • #27
w= mg

the answer I got was 41 deg
 
  • #28
thank you for your help!
 
  • #29
You're welcome!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K