Optimizing Bowling Ball Speed: Comparing 15 lbs and 16 lbs Balls

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter haxmya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Bowling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparison of bowling ball speeds between a 15 lb and a 16 lb ball, focusing on the kinetic energy and momentum involved in their motion. Participants explore the relationship between mass, speed, and energy transfer, while avoiding factors like ball rotation and lane friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how much additional speed a 15 lb ball needs to match the energy of a 16 lb ball, expressing confusion about the concepts of force and energy.
  • Another participant introduces the kinetic energy formula, suggesting that the initial impact on the pins will primarily involve straight-line kinetic energy.
  • A participant performs calculations to determine the kinetic energy of both balls, concluding that the 16 lb ball has the same energy as the 15 lb ball at half the speed, but expresses uncertainty about the results.
  • Another participant corrects a calculation error, indicating that the speed ratio between the two balls is negligible, suggesting that the 15 lb ball needs to be only slightly faster to achieve the same kinetic energy.
  • One participant emphasizes the role of momentum, stating that the 15 lb ball must travel at a speed ratio of 16/15 compared to the 16 lb ball, and discusses the implications of energy conservation and the effects on pin movement.
  • Another participant reflects on common algebraic mistakes in calculations, acknowledging an earlier error in their work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of kinetic energy versus momentum in determining the effectiveness of the bowling balls, and there is no consensus on the calculations or implications of energy transfer.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations presented rely on specific assumptions about energy transfer and do not account for factors such as rotational energy or lane conditions, which may affect the overall analysis.

haxmya
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I think this is a fairly basic question, but I have been out of physics since high school. Let's assume that I have two identical bowling balls, except that one is 15 lbs and the other is 16 lbs. If we avoid discussion about ball rotation and friction on the lane, how much additional speed does the 15 lbs ball need to match the energy (?) of the 16 pounder.

Possibly more at the heart of my confusion, is whether or not I'm dealing with Force which equals mass times acceleration if I remember right OR transmission of energy. Force seemed right to me to begin with, until I realized that the ball itself doesn't have positive acceleration at the time. So it seems that it may be how much energy the ball has to impart?

Do you guys think I'm on the right track there? Do you have any clarification on the two?

Thanks Folks! I sure do love bowling
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First cut at an answer, KE = \frac{1}{2}m v^2

The ball has a lot of rotational energy also, but the initial impact on the pins will mostly involve the straight-line KE being transferred to the pins, I would think.
 
Thanks Berkeman. So kinetic energy is the key. I'll have to try and do some calculations and see how that turns out.
 
I did some for you...using berkeman's formula,^ see above ^

KE=1/2(6.804kg)(8.9408m/s)^2
KE=271.944

6.804kg=15lbs 8.9408m/s=20mph

Now using that same KE found from throwing a 15lb bowling ball that reaches a velocity of 20mph, we will see at what velocity the 16 pounder will reach the same KE

271.944=1/2(7.257kg)(V)^2
135.972=7.257kg(V)^2
V^2=18.735
V=4.33m/s

7.257kg=16lbs

Okay, if this is the correct formula to use there appears to be a huge difference between the kinetic energy levels of each ball. The 16lb ball has the same energy that the 15lb ball has at HALF the speed!
Is this right? Looks fishy to me haha
 
Last edited:
It would actually be 8.657m/s as you have divided by two initially instead of multiplying the kinetic energy by two. Just a simple algebraic error there. If you take the ratio of the two speed they really are negligible. ratio ofthe speed of the 15ib to 16lb is ~1.03 so really there's not too much difference. In laymans terms you need to bowl the 15 pounder 0.03 times faster than the 16 pounder to achieve the same translational kinetic energy. Hope this helps.
 
I see it as a simple problem of momentum.

Momentum = mass * velocity

In other words, the 15lb ball will have to go 16/15 (sixteen fifteenths) the speed of the 16lb ball.
 
KingNothing said:
I see it as a simple problem of momentum.

Momentum = mass * velocity

In other words, the 15lb ball will have to go 16/15 (sixteen fifteenths) the speed of the 16lb ball.
Yes, the momentum is the key. Both momentum and energy will conserved, but some of the energy will have a different form other than kinetic energy - for example, some of the energy will create sound.

The difference in momentum will determine which ball has more effect on the movement of the pins.

Of course, the momentum the ball has when released depends primarily on how high the backswing is. If a person can't bring a 16 pound ball up as high on the backswing as they can a 14 pound ball or 12 pound ball, the loss of velocity on the release will more than negate the extra mass (actually, I think having enough wrist strength to hold the ball at the proper angle through the whole swing is usually more of an issue than being able to bring the ball back far enough on the backswing).
 
Hahaha I always make those simple algebraic mistakes..like missing one + or - sign on a calculus test question! I knew the answer looked funky..I read over my work again and realized what I had done, at that time I was unable to find this thread again to fix the error, until now.
 
Great discussion guys. Thanks all!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
10K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K