Optimizing Heater Size for Winter Protection of Centrifugal Water Pump

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing the heater size for a centrifugal water pump to prevent freezing during winter months. Participants explore the challenges of heat loss through conduction and convection, and the complexities involved in accurately sizing a heater for an enclosure around the pump.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a heated enclosure to protect the pump from freezing, expressing concerns about heat loss from the motor and platform.
  • Another participant suggests taking measurements to size the heater accurately.
  • A different participant emphasizes the need for relevant heat transfer equations to calculate conductive heat losses from the platform and motor.
  • One response provides a heat conduction model, introducing variables such as heat flux, area of contact, temperature difference, and thermal resistance.
  • A participant questions the appropriate area to use for calculating conduction losses from the motor, given the enclosure design.
  • Another participant clarifies that the entire surface area of contact should be used, noting that air is a poor conductor and convection dominates heat losses to the air.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about determining conduction loss from the pump to the motor and convection loss to the air.
  • Another suggests conducting an experiment to measure heat loss, highlighting the complexity of calculations for non-simple geometries.
  • A participant describes the operational challenges of ice formation in the pump and the need for immediate thawing when required.
  • One idea proposed is to keep the pump warm continuously, while also considering the potential energy costs involved.
  • Another participant discusses obtaining an upper bound for heat loss by assuming contact areas are maintained at the desired temperature, suggesting finite element heat transfer analysis may be necessary.
  • One response notes the difficulty of addressing the problem without seeing the design configuration and assumptions, hinting at the age of the pump system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on how to approach the problem, with no consensus on the best method for calculating heat loss or sizing the heater. Multiple competing ideas and models are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for specific measurements and assumptions regarding material properties, geometry, and environmental conditions, which remain unspecified in the discussion.

steves1080
Messages
64
Reaction score
1
I have a centrifugal water pump that I would like to protect during the winter months. The pipes can be drained, but there are some locations that are at risk for retaining trapped water, which can be problematic whenever we actually need to run the pumps. I am proposing that a heated enclosure be placed around the pump (see attached picture). However, I fear the exposed motor and the platform on which the pump sits will suck out a lot more heat than I anticipate. How can I accurately size a heater for this enclosure and take into account any conductive heat losses from these heat sinks? The platform is steel and the pump/motor are cast iron.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • pump heat.png
    pump heat.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 770
Engineering news on Phys.org
How can I accurately size a heater for this enclosure and take into account any conductive heat losses from these heat sinks?
Take measurements.
 
Thanks, but I was looking more along the lines of relevant heat transfer equations to use for determining how much is being lost due to conduction from the platform and the adjacent motor.
 
But you also wanted "accurate".
You can get ballpark figures by adopting a model for heat conduction ... like:

I = AΔT/R

I = heat flux
A = area of the contact
ΔT = temperature difference between the two surfaces
R = thermal resistance: which is a material property of the join.

It is the material property you'll probably have to measure.
You can look up these sorts of models in a standard engineering reference.
 
So if I wanted the conduction losses from enclosure to the ambient air via the exposed motor, would I just use the cross-sectional diameter of the motor as the A in the surface area? There will be a 17" hole in the enclosure the accommodate the motor connected to the pump.

Thanks
 
You would use the entire surface area of contact.

Air is a poor conductor of heat though, heat losses to the air are dominated by convection.
 
So I guess I'm not entirely sure how to determine the conduction loss from the heated pump to the exposed motor, and then the convection loss from the exposed motor to the cold air.
 
You do it by conducting an experiment.
It is non-trivial to calculate in detail except for simple geometries and relies on measured material properties plugged in as coefficients. What you really need to know is how accurate the calculation needs to be.

Really you just need to de-ice the pump right?
What would you normally do?
 
The pump does not completely drain, so some sections ice up and the pump has to be thawed with a heater when we need to use it, which is problematic when we're in a time crunch. Also, we could keep running the pump continuously as to keep water flowing. The purpose of this is to keep everything warm so that if we need to run the system we can do so immediately, and also not worry about seals leaking or ice forming inside an internal cavity.
 
  • #10
So one idea is to keep the pump warm all the time so it does not ice up - but you are also going to be concerned that this may cost more than its worth in energy.

The only simple way to proceede is to over-engineer the thing.
Work out the budget first.
 
  • #11
You can get an upper bound to the heat loss at the base and to the motor by assuming that the contact areas of the pump with the base and with the motor are at the temperature that you are trying to maintain inside the enclosure. This will eliminate the need to consider the enclosure and the pump. Even with this simplification, you may still have to use finite element heat transfer analysis. Do you have to worry about heat conduction from the base to the ground? I would treat the motor as a cylinder, and estimate the convective heat transfer coefficient by considering the range of wind velocities that will be encountered in practice. I don't see anything in the figure about the geometry in the depth direction.

Chet
 
  • #12
This is nearly impossible to address without seeing the design configuration, and assumptions. I'm assuming it is around 50+ years old.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K