Optimizing Motor Pulley & Rope Combination for High Speed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing a motor pulley and rope combination for a project involving high-speed rotation. Participants explore various methods to prevent rope overlapping during operation, focusing on the mechanics of pulley design and the properties of the rope used.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks advice on preventing rope overlap while the pulley rotates at 70 km/h, emphasizing the need for tension management.
  • Another suggests using eyelet bolts for physical separation of the rope wraps, which leads to a discussion about their practicality and effectiveness.
  • Concerns are raised about the torque generated by a single pulley and the potential wear issues associated with wrapping the rope multiple times.
  • A participant clarifies that they are using a diving rope capable of lifting 600 kg and cannot add more pulleys due to space constraints.
  • There is a proposal for using slip guides or wedges to manage the rope's position on the pulley, with discussions on materials like polypropylene and Teflon for wear resistance.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the feasibility of the proposed solutions under high speed and weight conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to prevent rope overlap. Multiple competing views and suggestions are presented, with ongoing uncertainty about the effectiveness of the proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the speed and tension of the rope, as well as the need for further clarification on specific mechanical concepts and materials. The discussion reflects a variety of assumptions and conditions that have not been fully resolved.

  • #31
If it is "one big rope loop" running between two sheaves, why not use a belt?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
sorry according to the original post they have it running at 70 mph not 70 rpm
 
  • #33
Actually it is 70 km/hr. which is about 43.5 m/hr.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K