Optimizing Skate Velocity: Static vs. Kinetic Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poetria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing skate velocity by analyzing the effects of static and kinetic friction coefficients. It concludes that decreasing the kinetic friction coefficient and increasing the static friction coefficient will enhance the average velocity of the skate. Participants clarified that static friction opposes relative motion and is crucial for propulsion, while kinetic friction is detrimental during sliding. The importance of precise definitions and understanding the role of friction in motion was emphasized throughout the conversation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Basic principles of physics related to motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of relative motion
  • Knowledge of how friction affects velocity in skating
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical models for static and kinetic friction
  • Explore the physics of motion in sports, particularly in skating
  • Investigate the impact of surface materials on friction coefficients
  • Learn about techniques to optimize performance in ice skating
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, sports scientists, coaches, and anyone interested in optimizing performance in skating or similar sports activities.

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42

Homework Statement


Which of the following could help to increase average velocity of the left skate of the person:

Decreasing the static friction coefficient between the skate and the ground.

Increasing the static friction coefficient between the skate and the ground.

Decreasing the kinetic friction coefficient between the skate and the ground.

Increasing the kinetic friction coefficient between the skate and the ground.

Increasing the distance between the lines (circa 5m)

Decreasing the distance between the lines.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I think increasing the static friction and decreasing the kinetic friction would help. Static friction works in the direction of motion, does it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poetria said:
Increasing the distance between the lines
What lines? Have you left out some of the problem statement? I would have guessed the distance between the feet, but 5m stretches more than just the imagination.
Poetria said:
Static friction works in the direction of motion, does it?
Friction, whether static or kinetic, opposes relative motion of the surfaces in contact. It will work in the direction of motion of the body (skater, walker, car, train...) if the part in contact with the ground is trying to go the other way.
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
Oh it is my fault. It is a video, you know. I have drawn it.

Yes, I know that friction opposes motion but if you push ice with a skate to gain speed, isn't the static friction opposing pushing but favouring gliding?
The example of a dog running on ice was simpler. :)
 

Attachments

  • Skaters.png
    Skaters.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 538
Poetria said:
Yes, I know that friction opposes motion but if you push ice with a skate to gain speed, isn't the static friction opposing pushing but favouring gliding?
The example of a dog running on ice was simpler. :)
Yes, indeed, static friction on the skate you're pushing back on is vital. But in your first post you wrote that 'static friction works in the direction of motion', and that is not always true. When a car brakes it opposes the motion of the vehicle. What is true in both cases is that it opposes relative motion of the surfaces in contact. In the case of the skate, the skater is pushing backwards on the skate. By resisting that relative motion, the static friction pushes the skater forwards.
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
Oh, yes, I admit, I was very imprecise. I got it. Many thanks :)
In the case of a dog it is better to increase both kinds of friction: the static and the kinetic because there is no sliding involved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K