Orbital Angular Momentum of the Sun-Jupiter System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the orbital angular momentum of the Sun-Jupiter system, specifically addressing the appropriate use of equations related to orbital mechanics and the implications of non-circular orbits. Participants are examining the correct parameters to consider, such as the semi-major axis and the concept of reduced mass.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of different equations for calculating angular momentum, questioning whether to apply the semi-major axis of Jupiter or the reduced mass. There is a debate on the relevance of reduced mass in this context, with some suggesting a more straightforward approach using average radius and velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various perspectives on the problem. Some express confusion about the appropriateness of averaging the radius and the implications of the Sun and Jupiter revolving around their common center of mass. There is no consensus yet, as differing interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement may lack clarity regarding the meaning of the semi-major axis in relation to Jupiter's orbit and the implications of non-circular orbits on the calculations. The original poster references a textbook problem that may not align with the current discussion's assumptions.

jinksys
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


EshyYl.jpg


In part A I know that I must use L = mu*Sqrt[GMa(1-e^2)], but for the variable 'a' do I use the semi-major axis of Jupiter or the semi-major axis of the reduced mass?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how you got that equation. This question does not require reduced mass concept. The Sun is stationary and Jupiter revolves around it.

Use L=mvr
substitute v from the equation T=2(pi)r/v
Now the r is actually the average of the radius at apogee and perigee.
i.e. r=(ra + rp)/2
Use properties of ellipse to find the unknown from the above equation.
If you have the mass of Jupiter you are done with the question.
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
I don't know how you got that equation. This question does not require reduced mass concept. The Sun is stationary and Jupiter revolves around it.
This is wrong. The question is rather explicitly asking the student to consider the problem of a non-circular orbit of an object with enough mass that the simplistic Keplerian approach is no longer valid.


jinksys said:
In part A I know that I must use L = mu*Sqrt[GMa(1-e^2)], but for the variable 'a' do I use the semi-major axis of Jupiter or the semi-major axis of the reduced mass?
How do you know that that is the equation you need to use?

Hint: Depending on what you mean by the "semi major axis of Jupiter", this is also wrong.

The question is a bit sloppy in that it doesn't say what that 5.2 AU means. The usual meaning is in terms of Jupiter's orbit about the Sun rather than Jupiter's orbit about the barycenter.
 
D H said:
This is wrong. The question is rather explicitly asking the student to consider the problem of a non-circular orbit of an object with enough mass that the simplistic Keplerian approach is no longer valid.

Can you explain me what is wrong?
Is there any problem with averaging the radius? Does the Sun + Jupiter revolve around their common centre of mass?
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
Can you explain me what is wrong?
Is there any problem with averaging the radius?
Yes,there is. You can't average the the radius and then assume as you said that "T=2(pi)r/v".

Does the Sun + Jupiter revolve around their common centre of mass?
Yes, they do.
 
I think I have misunderstood something.
This is a question in my book-
A planet is revolving around the sun. Its distance from the sun at apogee is Ra and that at perigee is Rp. The mass of the planet and sun is m and M resp, T is the time period of revolution of planet round the sun. What is the relation between T,M, Ra and Rp?

The answer given is T2 = π2(Ra + Rp)3/2GM, which is obtained by averaging the radius.

Is the answer given wrong? If yes then what laws should we use to find the relation?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K